These public formative checks are fresh on Days 185/190, not secure tests/whole-code attainment. Accept equivalent speech/sign/AAC/point/dictation/adult-directed making/no-touch account. Record first answer/source, exact assistance, revision and remaining gap. Adult must not supply evidence conclusion then claim independent child reasoning. Missing evidence is not yet observable, not a learner label. Fresh pacing is untested: offer pre-made neutral fields and oral/directed replies, one short prompt part at a time. Retain unfinished parts as not yet observed at 25 minutes; no extension/coached rescore claimed. Reading, craft, shape naming, movement, social tone, audience role and private family disclosure aren't assessed. No actual K02 outcome is supplied by fiction, marker completion or a simulated viewer response.
Paper Frame Book worked interpretation · Day 185
- A1 reports finishing on Story Day Five and page-border marking on Story Day Seven to celebrate it. A2 captions that marking/link/date, illustrating square page inside wide frame. Relevant question/source-linked fold, directed making or exact narrative counts; not geometric vocabulary. Next: point to report/trace and ask which tells event versus marking; don't give both conclusions before capture.
- Bela gives Bela's own reason; Cato reports drawing border with aunt Rumi on Story Day Seven. Cato's particular family/other sharing is supplied in fiction, not a real child/family or everybody's view. An object picture doesn't identify attendance, relationship, motive or everyone. Next: attach source-ID own reason and exact sharing separately; other reasons/sharing OPEN.
- A5 is planned later label, not completed making or another celebration. Actual observed classroom paper marker-making with help is a present action, not evidence of the historical event/marking. Next: keep PLAN, SOURCE REPORT and MADE/DIRECTED fields apart; preserve genuine help, no new commemoration inferred.
- Example source phrase: “Story Day Seven page-border marking, says A1/A2.” A source-linked oral guide is equivalent. Unsupported “All families…” or “another celebration…” needs repair; already fitting phrase may stay with explanation. No real source/copy/showing permission or viewer result is supplied. Next: preserve first/revised words and source reason; approval/use/response stay open unless actual authorised event is observed.
Paper Circle Note worked interpretation · Day 190
- B1 reports first reading on Story Day One and plans quiet look on Story Day Eight to remember it; source explicitly doesn't report completion. Davi's own significance can matter even while marking completion is unknown. Next: attach REPORTED READING and PLANNED LOOK separately; no actual commemoration inferred from a date/plan.
- Davi gives Davi's own reason. Esme reports first reading with other paper readers; Esme doesn't say joined later look, who else would, or a family relationship. Others at first reading aren't automatically sharing of a later actual commemoration. Next: keep particular account/time/sharing bound; family breadth remains open. No appearance/identity/motive inference.
- B2 is undated drawing; rectangle page/dot label don't date or explain their making, show completed marking or who joined. Need a permitted completed-marking source/context/date precision/link to significant event, such as after-event account, reviewed report or dated trace with confirmation. Next: add OPEN source question, don't invent historical date/use. A dated everyday activity alone is insufficient.
- Grounded phrase could be “Quiet look planned for Story Day Eight, says B1”; preserve/repair first claim to planned, or retain bounded original with reason. B5 asks marker/ask-first but records no use/real permission. A child can make/direct a paper marker, no-marker guide or owner-review kit without filling future marking/viewer fields. Next: separate source review from use; no invented viewer reply or new celebration to complete a record.
Daily record and next teaching move
| Code / evidence | Retain | Specific feedback |
|---|---|---|
| S01 | Child's event/source/marking/sharing question and help. Partial context, not every question type. | “What could this source tell us? What else needs asking?” |
| S02 | Source pocket, event/marking/plan pictorial fold, attributed/shared tabs, first/revised record. Not full maps breadth. | Keep original source and direct one source-linked correction. |
| S03 | Child's bounded perspective and particular-person significant-event account; not universal celebration meaning. | “Who says it matters? What are their words?” No own disclosure demanded. |
| S04 | Question-linked supported conclusion and limit. | “Reported, planned, made now, or open?” |
| S05 | Source/terms about actual/supplied past event; uncertain date/plan not retroactively made history. Partial row; place breadth not sampled. | “What happened then? What did we make now? Which source?” |
| K02 actual conditional | Actual significant event/relevance, completed celebration/commemoration/link, particular-person account and source-specific others/family sharing by element; first learner evidence/source/help. No actual K02 outcome has been collected in authoring. | Verify actual marking first; school/others source can support bounded elements. Missing private family breadth stays open; no completed-kit/full-row tick. |
| K01/K03/K04 | Hold pending separate authentic row-specific evidence/local authority. | An event venue isn't familiar-place/belonging/significance/care evidence for K03; one fictional cousin isn't actual K01; generic marker isn't K04. |
181: source/event question; date/routine alone insufficient. 182: completed marking/source link distinct from future label plan. 183: Kemi's own significance, not all. 184: Arlo with cousin Niv only, not actual family knowledge. 186: marker words chosen to find source; today's making doesn't create a celebration. 187: source repair doesn't create missing participation/date. 188: actual copied-pocket action or pass separate from past event; silence is not consent, a polite acknowledgement isn't learning proof. 189: useful return/handover with honest event/marking/now trail and family breadth open unless genuinely sourced.
Actual records stay locally under current source/audience/privacy/permission/ICIP rules. Preserve first words/help; direct observation versus source account, date precision, marking completion, person/account/sharing, private family supported/open, present making/action and exact response/pass remain separate. Source review is not proof of use. No human classroom/access/cultural/market validation supplied.