SubjectNest resource library

Development draft · local review needed

Day 168 · Can our small group see a pattern?Foundation Science · T4 W33–34 · Day 168 lesson

Prepare this lesson

Foundation / Science / Term 4 / Weeks 33 34

Part of the full lesson sequence. Check the pack guide and taught point before teaching.

Open for this lesson: Pack guide · Sources and materials · Optional practice · Check guide · Aids and text routes.

Download full sequence

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Learner choices

Goal/codes: Represent one or more actual observations and identify a small pattern only if comparable rows exist. Partial/conditional opportunities: AC9SFI02 / AC9SFI03 / AC9SFI04 / AC9SFI05.

Prepare: Shared actual rows or ROOF-NOTE-33 clearly labelled fiction; shared-try aid. Local preflight/access required; all physical actions adult-owned/approved.

  1. Start from real rows · 3 min. “What did our group actually notice?” One row is useful; it does not show a repeated pattern. Don’t run extra tries only to fill a target number.
  2. Associate the records · 4 min. Adult/child points to form/source/before/after for each row. Child draws/directs one provided template mark/word; shared adult scribing attributed.
  3. Look again if useful · 7 min. Only if a child’s question needs it and locally safe, make another agreed prediction/try. No record replacement if it differs or stops.
  4. Notice with guidance · 5 min. If two or more genuinely comparable rows exist, ask “Was anything alike in these tries?” Include a contrary/unclear row. A small pattern stays local, never all paper/creased forms.
  5. Choose what to tell · 4 min. Child shares one observation/pattern/unknown. In model route, say the notebook reports it; no real experiment or direct sensory evidence assumed.
  6. Keep · 2 min. Keep the small shared record and relevant individual response. No neat repeat sequence, exact counts or full logs from every child.

If not observed: keep the child’s question and access/contribution truthful. Offer a smaller welcomed route or later opportunity; pass/unavailable is not “cannot do.” Model/report can support reasoning, not invented direct sensory observation.