SubjectNest resource library

Development draft · local review needed

Day 167 · Keep, change or check againFoundation Science · T4 W33–34 · Day 167 lesson

Prepare this lesson

Foundation / Science / Term 4 / Weeks 33 34

Part of the full lesson sequence. Check the pack guide and taught point before teaching.

Open for this lesson: Pack guide · Sources and materials · Optional practice · Check guide · Aids and text routes.

Download full sequence

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Learner choices

Goal/codes: Use an own question to choose a small safe follow-up, preserving prediction/result. Partial/conditional opportunities: AC9SFH01 / AC9SFI01–AC9SFI04.

Prepare: Actual earlier row if available, otherwise new labelled try/plan; adult preflight. Local preflight/access required; all physical actions adult-owned/approved.

  1. Child chooses · 3 min. “Would you like to keep this setup, change one thing, or ask another question?” Keeping is a decision, no requirement for a bigger/better roof.
  2. Predict the next try · 4 min. Read own earlier result if real; child predicts a genuinely new action/recheck from that experience. If no earlier sample, say new evidence, not a repeat of invented history.
  3. Try gently · 7 min. Adult positions approved parts. Verify matched conditions when claimed; otherwise name differences. Child observes/directs or accesses another safe actual property/report. One action only if sufficient.
  4. Compare real rows · 5 min. “Did our later try look/feel the same, different, or unclear?” Describe the accessed property/source. Don’t substitute prior fictional notebook result.
  5. Choose a bounded sentence · 4 min. “With this paper and this setup we noticed ___.” “We need another look” is useful. Another question is not proof of its suggested cause.
  6. Care · 2 min. Save real rows/interruptions as needed. Stop with the useful result, no fixed repeat count or strength test.

If not observed: keep the child’s question and access/contribution truthful. Offer a smaller welcomed route or later opportunity; pass/unavailable is not “cannot do.” Model/report can support reasoning, not invented direct sensory observation.