Day 165 and Day 170 · first response before key/examples. These original source cases sample limited reasoning, not actual sensory investigation/full achievement or a term grade. Adult reads one short chunk/prompt at a time, with exact description, sign/AAC/drawing/scribe/director/no-contact response. Neutral support recorded; later short components allowed, not timed finishes. Keep sources out of planner, practice and home rehearsal. Creator: SubjectNest / NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd with Codex assistance, 30 September 2026, CC BY 4.0. Purpose: fresh bounded interpretation of a prediction/result or changed setup. All reported trials/observers fictional; no actual local result supplied.
Check AJ · the first contact report
Fresh AJ PDF / SVG / exact alternative. Source ROOF-CHECK-AJ-33, actual saved original text/diagram; fictional notebook.
Read source: “The invented roof uses paper from batch J on low cardboard supports at fixed marks. One broad very light card K is placed gently at the middle. Before the try, the prediction says: ‘The middle will keep a gap.’ Before K, a gap is reported as discernible. After K, the paper middle is reported to touch the mat; the support marks and card place did not shift.” No actual trial done here. No general strength/waterproofness, weather result, child’s sensory observation or real observer testimony given.
- “What did this notebook report before and after the card?”
- “Did the reported result match its earlier prediction? What tells you?”
- “What safe question would you like to check next? Could this report prove what every paper roof would do?”
Save source-bound first response, child’s own question/support privately. A truthful partial detail may be noticed through exact attributed reading; do not pretend visual motion from a still diagram.
Check AK · two different gaps
Fresh AK PDF / SVG / exact alternative. Source ROOF-CHECK-AK-34, same creator/date; actual saved text/diagram with fictional reports.
Read source: “Both invented roofs use paper from batch S, the same low cardboard supports and broad very light card M placed gently at the middle. Flat row: supports at the narrow-gap marks; before M, gap discernible; after M, gap still discernible. Creased row: supports at different wide-gap marks; before M, gap discernible; after M, middle touches the mat. No slip is reported. No prediction is recorded for either row.” Adult reads that form and gap differ; diagrams are schematic, not measurements. Other unknowns or direct physical trial evidence are not supplied.
- “What do the two rows report after the card? What changed in the setups?”
- “Could these rows prove ‘creasing always makes every paper roof stronger’ or tell us whether a prediction matched? Why or what is missing?”
- “Choose your own safe next question or small check. What would you want to keep/check before comparing another try?”
No single required next question, number of trials, fold pattern, emotion, arrangement or longer answer. A child can ask about form under checked same gap, a repeat, another approved observation or an unanswered relevant property. These are proposals until actual local preparation/try.
Short private record
Date/source/access ______; first source response ______; own next question/prediction if relevant ______; actual contribution/support/neutral prompt ______; later change if any ______; next teaching ______. MODEL / REAL OBSERVATION NOT AVAILABLE for direct-investigation claims from these cases. One response can be enough; don't reproduce every field as a child worksheet or invent actual material/performer/audience evidence.