SubjectNest resource library

Development draft · local review needed

Day 26 · More than two useful outcomesYear 5 Digital Tech · T1 W5–6 · Day 26 lesson

Prepare this lesson

Year 5 / Digital Technologies / Term 1 / Weeks 05 06

Part of the full lesson sequence. Check the pack guide and taught point before teaching.

Open for this lesson: Pack guide · Sources and materials · Fresh learner checks · Aids and text routes.

Download full sequence

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Learner prompts

Invite: How can a record choose among three alternatives?

Encounter/model: Pretend kite badges: input<2 add0; otherwise input<5 add3; otherwise add5. From0 on[1,3,8] the totals are0,3,8. Threshold2 belongs to the middle and5 to the last.

Own practical action: Choose an own invented three-outcome rule; create IF inside FOR EACH with a nested IF in one body. Fill both bodies, predict one useful input per outcome, run/inspect and change a threshold.

Observe/check: Does the second decision happen only after the first fails? Does changed input alter actual branch/action?

Possible misconception: Treating nested alternatives as two independent IF tests and applying both awards.

Next teaching move: Draw or state one decision path, then compare its actual branch trace.

Use: choose one route, one model or neither where unnecessary. No30-route log or all-context quota. Home/extra 6 is an independent free offer, not required catch-up.