SubjectNest resource library

Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Year 3 / Science / Term 1 / Weeks 09 10 / Provenance / Accepted Proposal

Development draft · local review needed

Twenty whole ordinary contextsYear 3 Science · T1 W9–10 · Provenance / Accepted proposal / Ordinary · Text version

Download editable text

Id

C01

Title

Lunchbox making trail

Complete source

Fictional lunchbox display: a clean foil sheet package says aluminium. The sheet is folded, and no maker or mine location is listed. F1 links bauxite to the industrial aluminium-making route. No food-contact, heat or leak trial is supplied.

Invitation

Make a tiny resource-to-object trail for a lunchbox-label reader. Choose paper drawing, spoken/AAC or a literal Desk note.

Ordinary possible response

The package names aluminium; F1 links its production with bauxite. I see a fold in this sheet.

Boundary

A fold is not a food-safety or local-mine result.

Next try

Try a different useful job for the same named metal, keeping its actual evidence boundary.

Id

C02

Title

Costume star clue

Complete source

Fictional costume studio: a shiny star drawing is labelled made-paper model; a separate foil scrap has an aluminium package label. The star has no material certificate.

Invitation

Choose which statement belongs to which object and put a source label next to it.

Ordinary possible response

The model star is paper in the source; the labelled scrap is aluminium. Shine alone does not identify either.

Boundary

Do not identify material from colour or shine; do not infer real wearability.

Next try

Offer a dull-looking supplied aluminium drawing and ask what a label can establish that appearance cannot.

Id

C03

Title

Repair-museum sequence

Complete source

Fictional museum cards list bauxite ore, alumina, aluminium metal and rolled foil; order and process are supplied from F1. A fifth manufacturer-space is empty.

Invitation

Arrange the four cards and explain one name change to a visitor.

Ordinary possible response

The ore and foil have different names because the source describes processing and making stages.

Boundary

The display does not reveal a manufacturer or demonstrate refining.

Next try

Choose one question for the empty manufacturer-space without inventing a supplier.

Id

C04

Title

Rock components postcard

Complete source

Fictional postcard has a rock outline filled with big pale/dark paper blocks. Historical U02 E3 describes minerals as rock components; no component names are given here.

Invitation

Write or direct a components caption and a question about the unnamed blocks.

Ordinary possible response

The paper blocks model components; this picture cannot name their minerals.

Boundary

A paper block is not a real grain or identified mineral.

Next try

Compare a second differently coloured model while keeping both identities open.

Id

C05

Title

Folded desk sign

Complete source

Fictional shop sign plan records a labelled foil strip bent into a curve. It needs a curved label, and the source records bending into that drawn curve only.

Invitation

Link the recorded property to the chosen sign job in one explanation.

Ordinary possible response

The supplied strip bends into the planned curve, which matters for this curved label.

Boundary

No strength, outdoor life or food-use evidence is supplied.

Next try

Choose a new need that bending does not answer, such as standing in wind, and leave a test question.

Id

C06

Title

Lamp-wire diagram

Complete source

Fictional reading-corner drawing labels a coil copper and shows no powered circuit. F2 links copper's electrical conduction to wiring.

Invitation

Give a source-supported wiring explanation without pretending the drawing is a test.

Ordinary possible response

F2 describes copper as a good electrical conductor used for wiring; this diagram did not measure it.

Boundary

No mains, disassembly, battery experiment or observed conductivity is invited.

Next try

Explain the difference between a provider property and a feature you can actually see in the diagram.

Id

C07

Title

Pot label with more than plants

Complete source

Fictional balcony display sketch shows leaf bits and spaces in sealed soil material. F3 describes soil roles for organisms and water as well as plants.

Invitation

Choose two roles for a visitor's fold-out card and one specimen question.

Ordinary possible response

Soils can provide habitat and regulate water; the source supports the general roles.

Boundary

The drawing gives no organism count, local water result or growth result.

Next try

Ask what observation would help tell who lives in one actual pot, without opening it now.

Id

C08

Title

Empty habitat window

Complete source

Fictional nature-table card shows a sealed soil view with no visible worm. The accompanying F3 role card describes soil habitats.

Invitation

Make a careful caption for the empty-looking view.

Ordinary possible response

No worm is visible in this supplied view; that does not show that soil cannot be habitat.

Boundary

Absence in a small view is not a survey of all organisms.

Next try

Offer a separate fictional close-up with a labelled organism and compare only the recorded views.

Id

C09

Title

Rain-role notice

Complete source

Fictional display writer says soil can regulate water, citing F3, and wants a water-role note. No filtered-water safety record is present.

Invitation

Make a useful role note with a clear open question.

Ordinary possible response

Soil water roles matter, but this record does not show our water is safe to drink.

Boundary

No tasting, filtration-for-drinking activity or pot-specific claim.

Next try

Choose what a suitable adult expert source would need to report for a different water question.

Id

C10

Title

Graphite industrial clue

Complete source

A fictional electronics exhibition uses a source-labelled text card F5. The 2017 USGS publication describes graphite properties relevant to electronics and lubricants. No mine/rank or current-market data is adopted.

Invitation

Give one source-described use relationship for the exhibition reader.

Ordinary possible response

F5 links graphite properties with industrial uses; the exhibit is a text explanation, not a working device.

Boundary

No battery disassembly, powder handling or pencil composition claim comes from this card.

Next try

Ask for a more specific safely readable product-source label instead of guessing every device contains natural graphite.

Id

C11

Title

Interval walk on paper

Complete source

Fictional tape diagram has zero, 1, 2, 3, 4 cm marks and a paper label spanning zero to four. Five tick marks bound four intervals.

Invitation

Use large paper steps or pointing to show the measured length.

Ordinary possible response

The span is 4 cm: I count the intervals from zero, not all five marks.

Boundary

Diagram reading is not measurement of an actual rock or scaled instrument operation.

Next try

Measure a different actual paper strip with a familiar ruler if supervised and wanted; keep its own record.

Id

C12

Title

Drawn parcel bases

Complete source

Fictional parcel drawings P and Q have printed base labels 3 cm and 5 cm. Print-size changes do not change the supplied recorded labels.

Invitation

Compare the supplied drawn bases and label the evidence source.

Ordinary possible response

Q is 2 cm longer than P in this supplied record; I have not measured actual parcels.

Boundary

No weight, strength or actual object dimension follows.

Next try

Offer actual large paper shapes and write a prediction before obtaining their own ruler readings.

Id

C13

Title

Repair table units

Complete source

Fictional display notebook lists sample A, trial1, collected water8 mL; sample B, trial1, collected water12 mL. It supplies no centimetres.

Invitation

Repair a table that wrongly labels its last column Length/cm.

Ordinary possible response

The column is Collected water/mL because those are the quantities supplied.

Boundary

A numeric difference alone does not identify the measured quantity.

Next try

Try an unrelated parcel-length table and choose its actual quantity/unit before graphing.

Id

C14

Title

A question bigger than its data

Complete source

Complete original fictional garden card, not local soil data. In one supplied trial, samples P and Q use the same described spoon size, each receives20 mL water, and the same filter setup and2-minute collection window are used. The labelled collected-water entries are P4 mL and Q9 mL. A visitor asks which soil grows the tallest tomatoes. No plant-growth, soil-quality, organism-count or drinking-water entries exist; no real child conducted this trial.

Invitation

Give a useful response that shows both a supported comparison and missing evidence.

Ordinary possible response

In this supplied single trial, P collected4 mL and Q9 mL, so P’s recorded amount is5 mL less under the stated setup. These are collected-water outputs, not tomato heights. I cannot rank tomato growth from this record.

Boundary

Collected water is not a universal soil-quality score.

Next try

Propose a specific separate growth question and suitable longer evidence; no plant result is invented.

Id

C15

Title

Library signal plan

Complete source

Fictional library display code says Circle = shelf needs review and Square = review complete. The log shows Circle at10:00, future10:30 blank.

Invitation

Explain the current plan decision using the whole supplied code.

Ordinary possible response

Circle tells the reader to review this shelf under this fictional plan; later completion is unknown.

Boundary

This is an ordinary reasoning analogue, not a soil sensor or a real library event.

Next try

Choose a question for the next record that would distinguish planned from completed work.

Id

C16

Title

Transport-board next record

Complete source

Fictional depot sign shows current red card = inspect the display label, blue = label inspected. The next row has no entry.

Invitation

Make a current decision and a next-record question.

Ordinary possible response

The red record supports the inspect-label plan; I need the later entry before saying it was inspected.

Boundary

Do not promise transport safety or identify an actual depot.

Next try

Use another invented code with an explicitly different legend and reread it before deciding.

Id

C17

Title

Source-hidden revision

Complete source

Fictional two captions: version1 says “This rock came from here”; version2 says “The supplied drawing does not name a quarry.” Neither names an actual place.

Invitation

Choose a keep/change/open reason for a display reader.

Ordinary possible response

I prefer the bounded second caption because it does not invent a local quarry.

Boundary

No caption establishes real location or mining permission.

Next try

Add a reviewed public source date if one is actually available; otherwise keep location open.

Id

C18

Title

Silence is not a review

Complete source

Fictional show invitation has no reader response. The owner wonders whether the trail was useful.

Invitation

Write an honest feedback record and a possible invitation.

Ordinary possible response

No feedback was supplied. I could ask a willing reader what they understand about my source.

Boundary

A silent or imagined reader is not evidence of uptake, access success or agreement.

Next try

Use one actual consensual question if available, then distinguish that reply from your own design choice.

Id

C19

Title

Two jobs, same resource

Complete source

Fictional maker chooses a source-labelled aluminium foil backdrop or a source-labelled aluminium-can diagram; F1 names both general uses. No specific product performance is tested.

Invitation

Choose a job and explain what source and further observation would help.

Ordinary possible response

The same named metal has different uses; my chosen job needs its own evidence.

Boundary

Do not transfer a folding observation to can strength or recycling outcomes.

Next try

Make a second explanation for the other reader with a different open question.

Id

C20

Title

A trail worth keeping

Complete source

Fictional folio contains an owner-chosen soil-role card citing F3 and an empty local-observation page. It is ready for a private reader but not a completed field study.

Invitation

Give one supported feature to keep and a new question.

Ordinary possible response

I will keep the source-linked habitat role and leave local organism observations open.

Boundary

Keeping a feature is legitimate; no annual mastery or local result is claimed.

Next try

Choose one small future evidence job with adult review and a different product, such as a water-role bookmark.

About this resourceReviewed source edition

Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.

Labels and search exclusions are distribution guidance; they do not authenticate or restrict access.

Exact source: 089d6ac9ec4293ea4b949980b0e79e5cbf08fc82 · 2026-10-13. Source edition, roles and hashes

Complete source and rights notices

Keep these full notices with copies of this resource. Learning text, software, art and outside sources keep their own terms.