# Twenty whole ordinary contexts ## Id C01 ## Title Lunchbox making trail ## Complete source Fictional lunchbox display: a clean foil sheet package says aluminium. The sheet is folded, and no maker or mine location is listed. F1 links bauxite to the industrial aluminium-making route. No food-contact, heat or leak trial is supplied. ## Invitation Make a tiny resource-to-object trail for a lunchbox-label reader. Choose paper drawing, spoken/AAC or a literal Desk note. ## Ordinary possible response The package names aluminium; F1 links its production with bauxite. I see a fold in this sheet. ## Boundary A fold is not a food-safety or local-mine result. ## Next try Try a different useful job for the same named metal, keeping its actual evidence boundary. ## Id C02 ## Title Costume star clue ## Complete source Fictional costume studio: a shiny star drawing is labelled made-paper model; a separate foil scrap has an aluminium package label. The star has no material certificate. ## Invitation Choose which statement belongs to which object and put a source label next to it. ## Ordinary possible response The model star is paper in the source; the labelled scrap is aluminium. Shine alone does not identify either. ## Boundary Do not identify material from colour or shine; do not infer real wearability. ## Next try Offer a dull-looking supplied aluminium drawing and ask what a label can establish that appearance cannot. ## Id C03 ## Title Repair-museum sequence ## Complete source Fictional museum cards list bauxite ore, alumina, aluminium metal and rolled foil; order and process are supplied from F1. A fifth manufacturer-space is empty. ## Invitation Arrange the four cards and explain one name change to a visitor. ## Ordinary possible response The ore and foil have different names because the source describes processing and making stages. ## Boundary The display does not reveal a manufacturer or demonstrate refining. ## Next try Choose one question for the empty manufacturer-space without inventing a supplier. ## Id C04 ## Title Rock components postcard ## Complete source Fictional postcard has a rock outline filled with big pale/dark paper blocks. Historical U02 E3 describes minerals as rock components; no component names are given here. ## Invitation Write or direct a components caption and a question about the unnamed blocks. ## Ordinary possible response The paper blocks model components; this picture cannot name their minerals. ## Boundary A paper block is not a real grain or identified mineral. ## Next try Compare a second differently coloured model while keeping both identities open. ## Id C05 ## Title Folded desk sign ## Complete source Fictional shop sign plan records a labelled foil strip bent into a curve. It needs a curved label, and the source records bending into that drawn curve only. ## Invitation Link the recorded property to the chosen sign job in one explanation. ## Ordinary possible response The supplied strip bends into the planned curve, which matters for this curved label. ## Boundary No strength, outdoor life or food-use evidence is supplied. ## Next try Choose a new need that bending does not answer, such as standing in wind, and leave a test question. ## Id C06 ## Title Lamp-wire diagram ## Complete source Fictional reading-corner drawing labels a coil copper and shows no powered circuit. F2 links copper's electrical conduction to wiring. ## Invitation Give a source-supported wiring explanation without pretending the drawing is a test. ## Ordinary possible response F2 describes copper as a good electrical conductor used for wiring; this diagram did not measure it. ## Boundary No mains, disassembly, battery experiment or observed conductivity is invited. ## Next try Explain the difference between a provider property and a feature you can actually see in the diagram. ## Id C07 ## Title Pot label with more than plants ## Complete source Fictional balcony display sketch shows leaf bits and spaces in sealed soil material. F3 describes soil roles for organisms and water as well as plants. ## Invitation Choose two roles for a visitor's fold-out card and one specimen question. ## Ordinary possible response Soils can provide habitat and regulate water; the source supports the general roles. ## Boundary The drawing gives no organism count, local water result or growth result. ## Next try Ask what observation would help tell who lives in one actual pot, without opening it now. ## Id C08 ## Title Empty habitat window ## Complete source Fictional nature-table card shows a sealed soil view with no visible worm. The accompanying F3 role card describes soil habitats. ## Invitation Make a careful caption for the empty-looking view. ## Ordinary possible response No worm is visible in this supplied view; that does not show that soil cannot be habitat. ## Boundary Absence in a small view is not a survey of all organisms. ## Next try Offer a separate fictional close-up with a labelled organism and compare only the recorded views. ## Id C09 ## Title Rain-role notice ## Complete source Fictional display writer says soil can regulate water, citing F3, and wants a water-role note. No filtered-water safety record is present. ## Invitation Make a useful role note with a clear open question. ## Ordinary possible response Soil water roles matter, but this record does not show our water is safe to drink. ## Boundary No tasting, filtration-for-drinking activity or pot-specific claim. ## Next try Choose what a suitable adult expert source would need to report for a different water question. ## Id C10 ## Title Graphite industrial clue ## Complete source A fictional electronics exhibition uses a source-labelled text card F5. The 2017 USGS publication describes graphite properties relevant to electronics and lubricants. No mine/rank or current-market data is adopted. ## Invitation Give one source-described use relationship for the exhibition reader. ## Ordinary possible response F5 links graphite properties with industrial uses; the exhibit is a text explanation, not a working device. ## Boundary No battery disassembly, powder handling or pencil composition claim comes from this card. ## Next try Ask for a more specific safely readable product-source label instead of guessing every device contains natural graphite. ## Id C11 ## Title Interval walk on paper ## Complete source Fictional tape diagram has zero, 1, 2, 3, 4 cm marks and a paper label spanning zero to four. Five tick marks bound four intervals. ## Invitation Use large paper steps or pointing to show the measured length. ## Ordinary possible response The span is 4 cm: I count the intervals from zero, not all five marks. ## Boundary Diagram reading is not measurement of an actual rock or scaled instrument operation. ## Next try Measure a different actual paper strip with a familiar ruler if supervised and wanted; keep its own record. ## Id C12 ## Title Drawn parcel bases ## Complete source Fictional parcel drawings P and Q have printed base labels 3 cm and 5 cm. Print-size changes do not change the supplied recorded labels. ## Invitation Compare the supplied drawn bases and label the evidence source. ## Ordinary possible response Q is 2 cm longer than P in this supplied record; I have not measured actual parcels. ## Boundary No weight, strength or actual object dimension follows. ## Next try Offer actual large paper shapes and write a prediction before obtaining their own ruler readings. ## Id C13 ## Title Repair table units ## Complete source Fictional display notebook lists sample A, trial1, collected water8 mL; sample B, trial1, collected water12 mL. It supplies no centimetres. ## Invitation Repair a table that wrongly labels its last column Length/cm. ## Ordinary possible response The column is Collected water/mL because those are the quantities supplied. ## Boundary A numeric difference alone does not identify the measured quantity. ## Next try Try an unrelated parcel-length table and choose its actual quantity/unit before graphing. ## Id C14 ## Title A question bigger than its data ## Complete source Complete original fictional garden card, not local soil data. In one supplied trial, samples P and Q use the same described spoon size, each receives20 mL water, and the same filter setup and2-minute collection window are used. The labelled collected-water entries are P4 mL and Q9 mL. A visitor asks which soil grows the tallest tomatoes. No plant-growth, soil-quality, organism-count or drinking-water entries exist; no real child conducted this trial. ## Invitation Give a useful response that shows both a supported comparison and missing evidence. ## Ordinary possible response In this supplied single trial, P collected4 mL and Q9 mL, so P’s recorded amount is5 mL less under the stated setup. These are collected-water outputs, not tomato heights. I cannot rank tomato growth from this record. ## Boundary Collected water is not a universal soil-quality score. ## Next try Propose a specific separate growth question and suitable longer evidence; no plant result is invented. ## Id C15 ## Title Library signal plan ## Complete source Fictional library display code says Circle = shelf needs review and Square = review complete. The log shows Circle at10:00, future10:30 blank. ## Invitation Explain the current plan decision using the whole supplied code. ## Ordinary possible response Circle tells the reader to review this shelf under this fictional plan; later completion is unknown. ## Boundary This is an ordinary reasoning analogue, not a soil sensor or a real library event. ## Next try Choose a question for the next record that would distinguish planned from completed work. ## Id C16 ## Title Transport-board next record ## Complete source Fictional depot sign shows current red card = inspect the display label, blue = label inspected. The next row has no entry. ## Invitation Make a current decision and a next-record question. ## Ordinary possible response The red record supports the inspect-label plan; I need the later entry before saying it was inspected. ## Boundary Do not promise transport safety or identify an actual depot. ## Next try Use another invented code with an explicitly different legend and reread it before deciding. ## Id C17 ## Title Source-hidden revision ## Complete source Fictional two captions: version1 says “This rock came from here”; version2 says “The supplied drawing does not name a quarry.” Neither names an actual place. ## Invitation Choose a keep/change/open reason for a display reader. ## Ordinary possible response I prefer the bounded second caption because it does not invent a local quarry. ## Boundary No caption establishes real location or mining permission. ## Next try Add a reviewed public source date if one is actually available; otherwise keep location open. ## Id C18 ## Title Silence is not a review ## Complete source Fictional show invitation has no reader response. The owner wonders whether the trail was useful. ## Invitation Write an honest feedback record and a possible invitation. ## Ordinary possible response No feedback was supplied. I could ask a willing reader what they understand about my source. ## Boundary A silent or imagined reader is not evidence of uptake, access success or agreement. ## Next try Use one actual consensual question if available, then distinguish that reply from your own design choice. ## Id C19 ## Title Two jobs, same resource ## Complete source Fictional maker chooses a source-labelled aluminium foil backdrop or a source-labelled aluminium-can diagram; F1 names both general uses. No specific product performance is tested. ## Invitation Choose a job and explain what source and further observation would help. ## Ordinary possible response The same named metal has different uses; my chosen job needs its own evidence. ## Boundary Do not transfer a folding observation to can strength or recycling outcomes. ## Next try Make a second explanation for the other reader with a different open question. ## Id C20 ## Title A trail worth keeping ## Complete source Fictional folio contains an owner-chosen soil-role card citing F3 and an empty local-observation page. It is ready for a private reader but not a completed field study. ## Invitation Give one supported feature to keep and a new question. ## Ordinary possible response I will keep the source-linked habitat role and leave local organism observations open. ## Boundary Keeping a feature is legitimate; no annual mastery or local result is claimed. ## Next try Choose one small future evidence job with adult review and a different product, such as a water-role bookmark.