Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Day 24 — Two jobs, one placeYear 1 HASS · T1 W5–6 · Teacher · Teacher / Day 24

Resource Weeks 05–06 · flexible 25-minute offer; select a smaller part and fit the actual HASS allocation.

O3 complete card

Child start · Home offer · Extra project.

Purpose/product: Two source-attributed wishes and a modest paper proposal that responds to a clue. K04/S03–S06. Prepare O3 full card and two blank caption spaces. Explain a supplied wish differs from a completed care action, real feedback and the child's own optional view.

Invite 3: “Can two people care about different things in one place?” Model 5: Read Isha and Omar's exact supplied words. Finding cards and pausing name different purposes; neither speaks for everyone. Match the library staff and garden club's stated jobs, without assigning the speakers a diagnosis or unmentioned role. Explicitly model the separate Mira sentence: the source says a lookup occurred, while its unrecorded result stays unknown; it does not mean no lookup happened. Model “I propose a clear model label because Isha wants to find cards”; this is an idea, not an adopted change.

Guide/own 10: Child chooses a quote, discusses a connection/difference with the other, then makes or describes one small model change supported by the source. Another wanted trial is optional; it is not a disability simulation or test of an unwilling classmate.

Three selectable mechanics:

1. Two-caption comic: Make two neutral speech bubbles or an exact two-voice account, name each fictional speaker and their stated wish, then add a separate proposal panel.
2. Build a choice model: Place the bench/bed/shelf paper features from O3. Try an optional label or extra model space while retaining source versus proposed changes. No claim that the paper model certifies real access.
3. Point-and-discuss a decision: Offer large quote/source/proposal slips, or usual communication without objects. Discuss why a choice fits one/both/neither stated wishes. A child can decline a personal preference.

Compare 4: Ask which source clue helped; accept more than one plausible idea. Check 3: “What does each person want? What did you suggest, and why?” If only names are matched, use two new ordinary toy-shop wishes and discuss purposes. If a wish is called observed success, keep supplied words and actual result separate.

Whole practical aid · Complete terms · Complete alternative · Own blank aids · Care Story Bench/paper.

Preparation · Actual capture · Framework and criteria scope. Sources and reuse. Original activity; selected guidance Modified from linked © State of Queensland (QCAA) 2023 under CC BY 4.0 and document exceptions. No official rating or endorsement.