Four roles below are author simulations, not participant feedback. An independent agent separately reviewed teaching, source cells, every actual PDF and browser behaviour. Root used the running finder through the in-app browser. No classroom/child/family/local device/access trial or measured learning gain occurred.
Teacher perspective
I followed three-thing guide → documented key → willing reader/private repair → own data → fresh E → later snapshots → unknown → optional lookup → own useful guide → fresh F. Prepare approved broad props/view outside the session and print one useful aid. Cards are item-indexed entries, not a spatial map. Ten starts allocate 3 + 4 + 5 + 7 + 4 + 2 minutes; actual pacing remains unpiloted. Several forms/check prompts may need further short sittings. Read one entry/prompt at a time, preserve first response before worked examples/key, distinguish actual handling/child direction/described plan and adult operation. Criteria identify observed scope/support/next moves without an ability score or full-standard verdict.
Parent/carer perspective
I checked ten optional three-minute bridges: one approved thing, pretend mark, willing helper or private keeping, empty category, later record and gap-spotting question. No purchase, printer, extra screen time, returned work, home map, family disclosure, photo or upload needed. Stop after one entry or pass; home participation is not assessment credit. Actual school records remain private.
Child perspective · author simulation
The practical question is “What does this guide tell us?” Choose a tiny collection/purpose/key, help a reader and spot a gap. Art/train/pretend repair/parcel/story contexts are invitations, not compulsory interests. Quiet/private work, exact words/sign/AAC, actual handling and adult-directed placement are choices. The finder changes representation while keeping data; it doesn't replace the child's own guide. Dense source/assessment language belongs to adults reading one short prompt. No speed, spelling, neatness, forced touch/public display or fixed learning style determines success. Interest/comprehension still need actual child use.
Funder/reviewer perspective
Original freely reusable content includes ten starts, 30 routes, 20 worked domains, ten home bridges and ten extra invitations, two fresh checks with a key and criteria, and nine print pairs with exact alternatives and finder/paper route. Exact source/rights/asset receipts support review. They do not establish time savings, demand, gains, all-state adoption or a complete grade. QCAA's indexed code discrepancy is retained against canonical workbook evidence; no authority endorsement is implied.
Independent findings and fixes
- An invented practice reader quote sounded like an actual reply. It is now explicitly conditional; no real reply supplied.
- Day44 heading assumed child authorship. It is now “Whose key is this?”; actual own key versus supplied model stays distinct.
- Materials promised two views; final finder has three. All documentation matches Pictures/Words/Symbols.
- Day41 assumed a supplied view marker. It now agrees/names or marks actual tabletop view and states item-indexed cards aren't a spatial map.
- Narrow table fragmented CLOTH/MIDDLE/RECORDED. It now uses three explicit source/time cards; all nine entries retained. Targeted 320/390 JavaScript on/off recheck confirmed readable whole words, exact associations and fit.
Root additionally shortened source options after actual 320px native label clipping. “Guide D · incomplete” now fits visibly; full source/time/unknown result stays explicit. Only option labels changed, not records/renderer/key/paper data.
Executed evidence
- Fresh official workbook HTTP 200 / 2,049,917 bytes / pinned SHA; three actual Foundation rows 20098 / 20105 / 20111 and import/crosswalk wording independently checked. Complete current official indexed QCAA 230317 and ACARA work-sample result compared; final direct-fetch/current PDF-byte limits recorded.
- All nine actual searchable single-page A4 PDFs rendered/inspected independently and as root contact sheet; fresh E/F at full size inspected. Whole SVG/PDF words, exact alternative reading order/diagrams, source positions/unknowns/key marks and measured margins pass. Untagged PDFs/tactile guidance are not PDF/UA or physical-access certification.
- Nineteen temporary regenerated outputs byte-identical: nine SVGs / nine PDFs/exact alternatives. Default source/content/print/JS/link/hash audit passes. Generator/verifier/probes formatted/linted.
- Ten temporary-copy defects rejected: source row, timing, fabricated reader wording, fresh answer leak, invented unknown location, mobile source mismatch, network API, printed unknown changed, wrong actual PDF and stale receipt. Original bytes/sizes/modification times unchanged.
- Independent browser review: 81 states, covering 27 source/item/view states at 1280/390/320. Actual data/key geometry/Words/no-picture/unknown, keyboard/reset/reload, no-JavaScript, zero errors/outside requests and empty storage passed. Targeted post-layout 320/390 with JavaScript on/off confirms all nine source/time/card associations and whole words; unchanged renderer/data did not need another full sweep.
- Root actual in-app use: D/BOX Words; D/BOX Symbols with triangle/meaning/NOT RECORDED; keyboard C/BOOK; reset and reload to A/BOOK/Pictures. At 320px page client/scroll both 305. Screenshots inspected, shorter option visibly fits. Review tab closed/viewport reset. Stopped local server caused one failed initial preview; restored fresh preview completed walkthrough. No learner details entered/submitted.
Remaining actual-use work
Local educator programme/source/safety/access/device/privacy/permissions review; teacher/child/family trials and feedback; actual child representation/physical forms/own-data decisions; actual running-system purpose/input/output where offered; real willing reader response where chosen; appropriately reviewed translations. Missing opportunities remain not offered/not observed. Several dated samples/local interpretation needed for reporting. None is inferred from authored models or technical checks.