SubjectNest resource library

Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Foundation / Design And Technologies / Term 4 / Weeks 35 36 / Checks

Development draft · local review needed

An animal-story cue gameFoundation Design Tech · T4 W35–36 · Checks / B first source · Text version

Download editable text

A make-believe story. A helper can read it one part at a time.

Cass wants a table game in which an own pretend animal-story cue helps a player choose a story beginning. Three broad blank whole parts and a pencil are available in the fiction. A broad cue needs a clear ready place and a proposed place/action during choosing. No animal facts, chosen cue, layout, steps, actual play or reset result are supplied. Animals are invented story pictures, not specimens or identification work.

Your questions

  1. Where would your parts be ready? What would a player do with them?
  2. What different arrangement or action could do that job? Which would you choose, and why?
  3. What could you use? Tell the setup, first action and who would act.
  4. How would you get ready again, or what do you prefer about your plan?

Your empty response page · Whole source text alternative · Direct whole SVG · Complete terms

Grown-up help after actual component relationships, different layouts, ready/use views and suitable step teaching, normally after Day 174. This is a source task about a plan, not a supplied finished board. Save an offered first idea before showing a worked example or a key. Record faithful access help separately from content/design help. Select only components actually taught and review exposure; the public forms are neither secure nor calibrated. Actual child making requires the child's own observed suitable action; adult manufacture is the adult's contribution. Actual familiar exploration is separate from interpreting a new fictional source. Never use response speed, handwriting, touch, compliance, sociability or length as design quality. These are original formative criteria, not official QCAA AP/MC/WW/EX/BA grading. [Separate staff criteria](../staff/B-first.html) · [Assessment chooser](../teacher/ASSESSMENT.html) · [Full notices](../SOURCE-NOTICE.html)
About this resourceReviewed source edition

Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.

Labels and search exclusions are distribution guidance; they do not authenticate or restrict access.

Exact source: 27ee8994bbd86009b885ec2610e799c77cc6e8e3 · 2026-10-09. Source edition, roles and hashes

Complete source and rights notices

Keep these full notices with copies of this resource. Learning text, software, art and outside sources keep their own terms.