An adult checks a broad public source before swapping the supplied Council example. Use the six empty lines below; keep “not stated” where a date is missing. Review whether the example actually answers today's question.
Title, responsible publisher and URL: ______
Stated publication/update date, or not stated: ______
Date personally reviewed: ______
Exact narrow fact in your own words: ______
Place, interval and interpretation limits: ______
Item-specific rights and decision: fact/link only, permitted asset with terms, or use labelled fiction: ______
Do not ask for addresses, household costs/use, identifying photographs or child enquiries. A publication date differs from a review date. A supply-system fact does not verify current individual quality/connection. First Nations knowledge/language needs its authorised owners, not a guessed translation.
Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.
Labels and search exclusions are distribution guidance; they do not authenticate or restrict access.
Source: https://neuroforge.io/subjectnest/library/resources/year-4/science/term-1/weeks-07-08/references/LOCAL-SOURCE-REVIEW-markdown · SubjectNest by NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd · Keep the complete source and licence companions; item rights remain separate.