Id
V01
Title
Pocket trail courier
Full text alternative
V01 — Pocket trail courier. Original proposed aid. Role: Choose, carry or explain a source-labelled trail; a helper reads/place cards without supplying the child’s connection.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional maker table. Nia has a clean, blunt-edged folded foil card, a drawing of a copper wire inside a lamp, and a sealed clear display of two labelled rocks. The foil package says aluminium; the wire drawing says copper. Nia can see folds in the card. Neither package names a particular mine. F1 describes bauxite as a common ore used to make aluminium through industrial processing. F2 describes copper's use in electrical wiring. These are source facts, not tests Nia performed. Nia wants a little trail label for a visitor who asks, “Is this just something from a shop?” No visitor has replied yet.
Complete layout and relationships: Top complete source in a labelled supplied-fiction region. Three middle panels Object label, Resource/source, Useful job: aluminium foil package links to F1 bauxite-to-aluminium industrial route then visitor label job. Separate Observation panel says visible fold in Nia’s story; the line does not make it a mine identification. Dotted Still open branch ends at mine/manufacturer/performance/reader reply not supplied. Bottom is a separate empty own three-panel strip. Copper drawing/F2 route is an alternative described in the whole source.
Visible labels in reading order: V01 ordinary model Object label: aluminium foil F1 resource/source: bauxite making route Useful job: visitor label Supplied observation: fold Mine/manufacturer/performance/reply open My object/source My job My question
Own-work state: Three own panels empty; ordinary source/model stays separately labelled above. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V02
Title
Making concertina and rock neighbour
Full text alternative
V02 — Making concertina and rock neighbour. Original proposed aid. Role: Arrange/describe a complete making trail and distinguish a rock model from a manufactured metal.
Complete visible source: Fictional repair-display notes. Four cards read: bauxite ore; alumina from refining; aluminium metal from smelting; thin aluminium foil from rolling. The cards describe an industrial route from F1; they are not a recipe for children. Another display card says minerals contribute to rocks, following the historical national U02 E3 reference. A labelled composite-rock drawing shows pale and dark components, but does not name them. A red wrapper is nearby and has no material label. The visitor wants to know why the first card and final foil card have different names.
Complete layout and relationships: Below whole source, four-card industrial row Bauxite ore→Alumina→Aluminium metal→Foil product. Arrows refining/smelting/rolling, F1 identity beside the row, industrial-source description not child procedure. Separate rock-components drawing has pale/dark areas labelled components unnamed; colour identifies no minerals. Unlabelled red wrapper separate: material unknown. Mine/manufacturer dotted branch stays open. Bottom three own reasoning boxes.
Visible labels in reading order: V02 industrial source trail Bauxite ore Refining Alumina Smelting Aluminium metal Rolling Foil product F1 industrial processing, not child procedure Rock components unnamed Wrapper material unknown My stages explanation My drawing boundary My question
Own-work state: Own three boxes empty; no heating/extraction/scratching/local mine assertion. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V03
Title
Job-and-clue duet
Full text alternative
V03 — Job-and-clue duet. Original proposed aid. Role: Link a property and source to a practical job while keeping untested outcomes open.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional pop-up workshop. Mina makes a foldable aluminium backdrop for a puppet scene; the labelled foil bends into a curve. A separate diagram shows a copper electrical wire in a reading lamp. F2 describes copper as a good electrical conductor and links this property to wiring. F1 describes aluminium foil as thin rolled aluminium. No child is asked to handle electricity or prove conductivity. Mina's curved backdrop stands only in the supplied drawing. Its strength, heat performance and suitability for outdoor weather have not been measured.
Complete layout and relationships: Full source first. Parallel ordinary lanes: foil backdrop→supplied bend→curved puppet backdrop job; copper lamp diagram→F2 conduction reference→wiring job. Each connector explains why the property matters, not that a drawing tested electricity. Still untested flags name outdoor strength/heat or actual conductivity. Empty own lane below: Job, Source/property clue, Explanation, Boundary. No live apparatus resembling an instruction.
Visible labels in reading order: V03 two useful jobs Foil supplied bend→curved backdrop Copper F2 conduction→wiring Actual conductivity untested Outdoor strength/heat unmeasured My job My clue/source My explanation My boundary
Own-work state: Four own boxes empty; no universal best-material claim/electrical handling. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V04
Title
Soil role fold-out
Full text alternative
V04 — Soil role fold-out. Original proposed aid. Role: Make useful role labels and name what would require actual specimen evidence.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional balcony club. A sealed display sketch shows crumbly material, a leaf piece and spaces; no living animal is shown. A source card F3 describes soils as habitats for organisms, supporting plants and regulating water. These general soil roles come from USDA NRCS, not from the sketch proving local performance. A second source card F4 describes CSIRO's Chameleon system as using soil-water information to help irrigation decisions. The club wants three short labels for a soil display: plant support, habitat, and water. Nobody has tested drinking-water safety or sampled the balcony soil.
Complete layout and relationships: Three equal panels Plant support, Habitat, Water regulation joined only by a frame F3 general roles. Separate sealed-display sketch caption says leaf piece/spaces/no animal shown. Do not draw organisms as observations. F4 separate note: soil-water information can inform irrigation decisions; no sensor reading given. Blank question tabs and visitor-label space below. Footer: no local organism count/growth/drinking-water result.
Visible labels in reading order: V04 source-described roles F3 plants F3 habitat F3 water regulation Sketch leaf/spaces; no animal shown F4 irrigation-information role Local performance and water safety unknown My specimen question My visitor label
Own-work state: Own question/label spaces empty; general roles are supplied knowledge, not proof of local performance. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V05
Title
Museum components and unknown token
Full text alternative
V05 — Museum components and unknown token. Original proposed aid. Role: Describe a visible model honestly; optional first held work uses its own separate full source/mat.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional museum-button display. A source label says minerals are components of rocks; a drawing has two differently coloured component areas. A visitor wants to understand that relationship without guessing names. A sealed label on a separate metal token is unreadable. No later source, assessment key or hidden material identity is contained here. This is ordinary practice if a held first task is declined or prerequisites are not yet available.
Complete layout and relationships: Complete ordinary source first. Large abstract rock outline with pale/dark patterned regions labelled unnamed components; caption source describes minerals as rock components but names absent. Separate smooth unlabelled token: resource unknown. Three organiser headings Source, Drawing/model, Needs new evidence, with only ordinary supplied-description slips. Own description/boundary/question below. Held A/B/C/D tasks entirely separate.
Visible labels in reading order: V05 ordinary museum model Pale/dark components unnamed Historical U02E3 minerals contribute to rocks Token resource unknown Source Drawing/model Needs new evidence My description My boundary My question
Own-work state: Three own areas empty; no held key or mineral identification from colour. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V06
Title
Ruler before and after lane
Full text alternative
V06 — Ruler before and after lane. Original proposed aid. Role: Distinguish retrospective data from a new genuine prediction/familiar-instrument measurement opportunity.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional storeroom plan. Two labelled rock-display silhouettes, S and T, lie beside a printed centimetre scale. S spans 0–4 cm and T spans 0–6 cm on the supplied diagram. The plan asks, “Which labelled silhouette has the longer base in this drawing?” The same scale, left-edge zero convention and base direction are used. A sealed display cannot be scratched or opened. The supplied readings are retrospective: they are not children's prior predictions or measurements of actual rocks. A separate optional classroom job uses two large plain paper rectangles, chosen by the adult, to practise a real ruler procedure.
Complete layout and relationships: Whole ordinary source. Supplied diagram baselines S0–4cm/T0–6cm with shared zero, identical1cm intervals, endpoints/units printed and diagram-only caption. Before prediction lane explicitly says no prior prediction supplied; never implies an existing prediction. Lower independent New plain-paper investigation area has five empty headings Question, Before prediction and clue, Safe/fair plan, Actual ruler reading and unit, After comparison. Drawn ruler is a model; actual I03 opportunity uses a real familiar cm ruler on plain paper under adult preparation.
Visible labels in reading order: V06 supplied S4/T6cm Shared zero, equal1cm intervals No before prediction recorded New paper investigation not yet performed My question My before prediction/clue My safe/fair plan My actual reading/cm My after comparison
Own-work state: All five own areas empty; declining is allowed. Reading the diagram is not physical I03 conduct. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V07
Title
Six-record collection gallery
Full text alternative
V07 — Six-record collection gallery. Original proposed aid. Role: Represent all supplied quantities accurately and explain a bounded pattern, with provided graph scaffold.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional town-display record, not real local soil data. The same described spoon size, 20 mL water addition, filter setup and 2-minute collection window were used for samples labelled R and S. Collected-water entries in mL are R: 6, 8, 7; S: 12, 10, 11. Six separate trials are shown. The notebook does not record plant growth, drinking-water quality, organism counts or long-term field conditions. The display reader asks how much was collected in each recorded trial, not which soil is always best. The adult can use the supplied record without conducting this physical procedure.
Complete layout and relationships: Complete ordinary source at top. Entire table R/S and trial1/2/3: R6,8,7 and S12,10,11mL. Conditions same20mL input/filter/2minute wait supplied, no actual local trial. Paired graph panels share zero and equal2mL ticks0,2,4,6,8,10,12;7/11 halfway with exact numeral labels. Names/patterns duplicate colour. Empty pattern/boundary below; no plant-growth/drinking-water axis. Optional selector initially no trial selected; table always visible.
Visible labels in reading order: V07 supplied collection, mL 20mL input/same filter/2minute wait supplied Trial1 R6/S12 Trial2 R8/S10 Trial3 R7/S11 Zero0/equal2mL intervals Odd values midway with exact numerals My pattern My boundary No growth/safety result
Own-work state: Own two areas empty; supplied fiction is not observed child data. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V08
Title
A legend is a promise about a code
Full text alternative
V08 — A legend is a promise about a code. Original proposed aid. Role: Use whole legend and supplied record to justify one limited plan decision; code is not moisture measurement.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional irrigation-story board. In this imagined garden only, a recorder code says BLUE = more water than this plan needs now; GREEN = enough for this plan now; RED = less than this plan needs now. At 09:00 bed L is BLUE and bed M is RED. Tomorrow is empty. The agreed fictional plan says pause adding water at BLUE and review/add the planned amount at RED with the supervising adult. This is not a calibrated local sensor or a rule for real plant care. F4 independently describes CSIRO's Chameleon research as helping farmers interpret soil water at different depths to make decisions; its page was last updated in 2022, not a 2026 result tally.
Complete layout and relationships: Whole ordinary fictional irrigation-story source first. Three shapes print the exact invented legend labels BLUE more water than this plan needs now; GREEN enough for this plan now; RED less than this plan needs now. L is BLUE and M is RED at09:00; this fictional plan pauses adding water at BLUE and reviews/adds its planned amount at RED with the supervising adult. Colours only repeat text/shape. Source records connect to their exact named labels, tomorrow row explicitly blank. F4 separate provider box describes research soil-water information for farmer decisions; heavy boundary separates actual provider account from invented code. No Chameleon resemblance/calibration/actual colour scheme. Three empty own explanation/need/question areas.
Visible labels in reading order: V08 invented legend BLUE more water than this plan needs now GREEN enough for this plan now RED less than this plan needs now 09:00 LBLUE/MRED Plan pause atBLUE; review/add planned amount atRED with adult Tomorrow entry blank F4 separate provider, not this code My data-to-explanation link My useful decision My remaining question
Own-work state: Three own areas empty; generation must preserve exact source connectors and missing future state. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V09
Title
Make a useful resource card
Full text alternative
V09 — Make a useful resource card. Original proposed aid. Role: Make a pocket label/visitor card/quiet explanation for a chosen purpose; optional actual reader and purposeful revision.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional community-show preparation. Sami chooses a foil making trail for a younger reader, a soil-role door for a family visitor, or a copper-wire fact card for a repair-display reader. The brief asks for one source-labelled resource explanation, one visible or supplied property clue with its provenance, and one open question. A pretend reader note says “I can't tell which bit you saw.” This note is fictional feedback, not a child-tested outcome. A real invited adult or peer may give different feedback or none.
Complete layout and relationships: Whole ordinary source then left guide with process headings Resource/source→Property/evidence→Useful reader job→Open question, not a held answer. Right own product area entirely empty, heading outside. Below two empty own-copy strips labelled My chosen version1 and My chosen version2. Actual chosen names must top comparison columns; slot numbers preserve identity when names equal/empty. Reader reply area says no reply supplied, optional actual consented reply later. Empty own keep/change/open reason.
Visible labels in reading order: V09 practical own product Resource/source Property/evidence Useful reader job Open question My product My chosen version1 My chosen version2 No actual reader reply supplied My keep/change/open reason
Own-work state: All product/copy/reply/reason areas empty; two drafts optional; silence is not evidence of success. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V10
Title
Small folio, honest next step
Full text alternative
V10 — Small folio, honest next step. Original proposed aid. Role: Reflect on practical work and nominate a useful next question without claiming annual attainment.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional end-of-show folio. Kit has a resource trail version1 and version2, both made from the ordinary F1/F2/F3 sources. A folio slip asks for the source supporting one explanation, a selected change or deliberate kept feature, and a question that needs new evidence. There is no claim that every Earth resource, every national description or a real visitor outcome has been demonstrated. An eligible corresponding held later family can be offered separately after actual first capture/decline and teaching; it is not part of Kit's ordinary folio source.
Complete layout and relationships: Full ordinary Kit account first. Separate ordinary example organiser Kept with reason, Changed with source/evidence reason, Still open, labelled example. Empty own organiser below repeats those headings plus Next useful question. Adult-only empty record footer Date/source/mode/support/actual-or-supplied. Friendly child prompt Pick a useful clue to keep; no grade meter/completion stars/annual A–E total. Later held work separate on matching exact blank mat.
Visible labels in reading order: V10 ordinary Kit folio Kept with reason Changed with evidence/source reason Still open My keep My change My open My next question Adult record date/source/mode/support/actual-or-supplied
Own-work state: Own reflection/adult record areas empty; no proof every child conducted every activity. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V11
Title
Nine-heading paper Trail Desk
Full text alternative
V11 — Nine-heading paper Trail Desk. Original proposed aid. Role: Use identical nine meaning jobs on paper/spoken/signed/AAC/verbatim helper record with confirmed read-back.
Complete visible source: A genuinely empty own paper workspace; sources are separate named references. No prefilled child trail, local fact, diagnosis or completed example.
Complete layout and relationships: Two-page paper twin: page1 first five numbered FIELDS, page2 headings6–9, every heading above a generous empty rectangle. Footer outside areas: paper words remain when you finish/put it away; Clear current is digital only. Two optional extra owned-copy sheets have blank user-chosen title/date headings. One-at-time cards repeat one exact numbered heading. Whole nine-heading text equivalent and source references available. Finish erases nothing.
Visible labels in reading order: Trail name Useful job and reader Source identity, date and fiction status Resource or supplied label Recorded property Use or importance explanation Evidence and its boundary My keep, change or open reason Next question or plan Paper stays yours when you finish Optional owned copy1 Optional owned copy2 Read whole separately named source
Own-work state: Nine own areas/two optional copies empty; directions outside; paper retained until owner chooses otherwise. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V12
Title
Ordinary record lens — choose a trial
Full text alternative
V12 — Ordinary record lens — choose a trial. Original proposed aid. Role: Manipulate a meaningful information view and check table-graph relationships, without physical-simulation claims.
Complete visible source: Ordinary fictional town-display record, not real local soil data. The same described spoon size, 20 mL water addition, filter setup and 2-minute collection window were used for samples labelled R and S. Collected-water entries in mL are R: 6, 8, 7; S: 12, 10, 11. Six separate trials are shown. The notebook does not record plant growth, drinking-water quality, organism counts or long-term field conditions. The display reader asks how much was collected in each recorded trial, not which soil is always best. The adult can use the supplied record without conducting this physical procedure.
Complete layout and relationships: Whole six-record source/table visible. Four controls Trial1/Trial2/Trial3/Show all initially none selected; frame says No trial selected. Choice1 reveals R6/S12,2 R8/S10,3 R7/S11mL; Show all exposes all six. Shared zero/equal2mL ticks0–12, odd values half intervals and exact labels. View selection reveals existing fiction only; no time advance, new water, prediction, physical trial or own-word insertion. Four paper view cards with full table/conditions on reverse and complete spoken/AAC equivalent. No-JS shows full table/static views honestly.
Visible labels in reading order: V12 ordinary supplied record lens No trial selected initially Trial1 R6/S12mL Trial2 R8/S10mL Trial3 R7/S11mL Show all six records Zero/equal2mL ticks/exact numerals 20mL input/same filter/2minute wait supplied Choice reveals fiction, not experiment My explanation empty
Own-work state: Selection does not fill own text. Explanation empty; no autoplay/sound/sensor/score. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V13
Title
A-first exact source/four-prompt own mat
Full text alternative
V13 — A-first exact source/four-prompt own mat. Original proposed aid. Role: Capture owned responses/decline after actual opportunity with exact whole source/prompt identity in every mode.
Complete visible source: Complete original fictional parcel-stage account. The maker needs a bendable display card for a curved sign, not a real food wrapper. PackageK names aluminium foil. Supplied observation at the story table: K has a visible fold and can be bent into the drawn curve. F1 describes bauxite as a common ore in the industrial aluminium-making route and thin rolled foil as a use of aluminium. No ore processing was observed at this table, no mine/manufacturer is named, and the sign has not been tried outdoors or by an actual parcel reader. A separate unlabelled shiny drawingJ gives no material identity. The maker wants a useful resource/property/job note and a new question.
Complete layout and relationships: Multi-sheet text-first mat: source identity and complete neutral source first; four numbered exact prompts follow in order, each above a generous EMPTY own rectangle. Repeat source identity/honest page order if extra pages required; no unreadably shrunken source. No criterion/model/next lesson or answer-hint connector. Source remains complete and readable as text. Digital native source disclosure initially closed has identical whole neutral source; four own fields genuinely empty. Spoken/signed/AAC/verbatim scribing uses exact prompts one at a time if wanted with read-back confirmation.
Visible labels in reading order: V13 A-first neutral supplied fiction Parcel-stage fold card Read/hear complete source in place 1. Name one supplied property of K and the source that links its named material to an Earth resource. 2. Separate what the story-table observer recorded from what F1 describes. 3. For the curved-sign job, offer a choice using a clue and say what remains untried. 4. Ask one useful new question for the maker, leaving its result open. Own response1 empty Own response2 empty Own response3 empty Own response4 empty Open/close source keeps words; leaving/reload may lose digital drafts Paper records stay on paper
Own-work state: All four own areas empty; no staff key/model/criterion in source help or plane; page splitting never truncates source. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V14
Title
B-first exact source/four-prompt own mat
Full text alternative
V14 — B-first exact source/four-prompt own mat. Original proposed aid. Role: Capture owned responses/decline after actual opportunity with exact whole source/prompt identity in every mode.
Complete visible source: Complete original fictional tree-pot viewing account. A sealed display sketch P shows brown particles, two leaf pieces and spaces. Its picture window shows no visible animal; organism identity/count, nutrients, water movement and plant growth are not measured. F3 describes soil roles in supporting plants, providing habitat and regulating water. That general account is not a result from this display or proof that a particular pot cleans drinking water. The visitor’s job is to understand two useful soil roles and a view-level limit. A possible later observation plan would keep the sealed display closed, use the same view/window and record visible features; no observation has yet been conducted by the child.
Complete layout and relationships: Multi-sheet text-first mat: source identity and complete neutral source first; four numbered exact prompts follow in order, each above a generous EMPTY own rectangle. Repeat source identity/honest page order if extra pages required; no unreadably shrunken source. No criterion/model/next lesson or answer-hint connector. Source remains complete and readable as text. Digital native source disclosure initially closed has identical whole neutral source; four own fields genuinely empty. Spoken/signed/AAC/verbatim scribing uses exact prompts one at a time if wanted with read-back confirmation.
Visible labels in reading order: V14 B-first neutral supplied fiction Tree-pot viewing card Read/hear complete source in place 1. Name two visible features supplied in P, without adding an unseen organism. 2. Use F3 to describe one soil role and say what P does not establish about that role. 3. What local organism or water result remains unknown in this account? 4. With a scaffold, suggest one safe planned viewing step and one thing to keep similar for a new view comparison. Own response1 empty Own response2 empty Own response3 empty Own response4 empty Open/close source keeps words; leaving/reload may lose digital drafts Paper records stay on paper
Own-work state: All four own areas empty; no staff key/model/criterion in source help or plane; page splitting never truncates source. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V15
Title
C-first exact source/four-prompt own mat
Full text alternative
V15 — C-first exact source/four-prompt own mat. Original proposed aid. Role: Capture owned responses/decline after actual opportunity with exact whole source/prompt identity in every mode.
Complete visible source: Complete original fictional display-ledge diagram account. Drawn labelled bases M and N use a printed centimetre scale from zero with equal1cm intervals. M spans0–3cm; N spans0–5cm. Those are supplied diagram readings, not dimensions of real rocks or the child’s own ruler measurements. The diagram records no prior prediction. Its display-reader job is to compare these two drawn bases accurately. A separate new plain-paper measuring plan could ask which chosen paper base is longer, use a familiar centimetre ruler with zero aligned and the same base direction, and keep an actual prediction before its own measurement. No new paper result is supplied.
Complete layout and relationships: Multi-sheet text-first mat: source identity and complete neutral source first; four numbered exact prompts follow in order, each above a generous EMPTY own rectangle. Repeat source identity/honest page order if extra pages required; no unreadably shrunken source. No criterion/model/next lesson or answer-hint connector. Source remains complete and readable as text. Digital native source disclosure initially closed has identical whole neutral source; four own fields genuinely empty. Spoken/signed/AAC/verbatim scribing uses exact prompts one at a time if wanted with read-back confirmation.
Visible labels in reading order: V15 C-first neutral supplied fiction Display ledge diagram Read/hear complete source in place 1. Compare the two supplied drawn base lengths with their unit and a real-object limit. 2. Is a before-measurement prediction supplied here? Explain using the account. 3. Make two matching record rows for M and N with supplied base length and source/unit. 4. With guidance, propose one suitable ruler-reading step for the separate new paper plan and keep its result open. Own response1 empty Own response2 empty Own response3 empty Own response4 empty Open/close source keeps words; leaving/reload may lose digital drafts Paper records stay on paper
Own-work state: All four own areas empty; no staff key/model/criterion in source help or plane; page splitting never truncates source. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V16
Title
D-first exact source/four-prompt own mat
Full text alternative
V16 — D-first exact source/four-prompt own mat. Original proposed aid. Role: Capture owned responses/decline after actual opportunity with exact whole source/prompt identity in every mode.
Complete visible source: Complete original fictional garden-monitor planning account. The plan’s invented legend says triangle = review the water plan now; circle = review already logged. At09:00 trayP shows triangle; trayQ shows circle. The next record at10:00 is empty. The plan is to check the written water record when triangle appears; neither symbol measures water content or proves irrigation success. F4 separately describes CSIRO research using soil-water information to support farmer decisions, on a page last updated16November2022. No CSIRO sensor, real garden outcome or actual child measurement appears here. Fictional readerR says “Pneeds a review”; fictional readerS says “all future work is complete”. Those are story views, not real peer opinions. Job: explain a present record and a useful next evidence question.
Complete layout and relationships: Multi-sheet text-first mat: source identity and complete neutral source first; four numbered exact prompts follow in order, each above a generous EMPTY own rectangle. Repeat source identity/honest page order if extra pages required; no unreadably shrunken source. No criterion/model/next lesson or answer-hint connector. Source remains complete and readable as text. Digital native source disclosure initially closed has identical whole neutral source; four own fields genuinely empty. Spoken/signed/AAC/verbatim scribing uses exact prompts one at a time if wanted with read-back confirmation.
Visible labels in reading order: V16 D-first neutral supplied fiction Garden-monitor planning card Read/hear complete source in place 1. Use one supplied symbol/record to explain the plan’s current decision, without inventing later success. 2. Separate F4’s general provider example from the fictional monitor card. 3. Compare the two fictional reader views with the supplied record and keep their status clear. 4. Ask a further evidence question for the plan reader, leaving its actual result open. Own response1 empty Own response2 empty Own response3 empty Own response4 empty Open/close source keeps words; leaving/reload may lose digital drafts Paper records stay on paper
Own-work state: All four own areas empty; no staff key/model/criterion in source help or plane; page splitting never truncates source. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V17
Title
A-later exact source/four-prompt own mat
Full text alternative
V17 — A-later exact source/four-prompt own mat. Original proposed aid. Role: Capture owned responses/decline after actual opportunity with exact whole source/prompt identity in every mode.
Complete visible source: Complete original fictional festival repair-display account. A wire-loop drawingL has a copper label; the story observer records it as coiled with two visible ends. F2 describes copper’s electrical conduction and its use in wiring. No conductivity test or powered circuit is present. The reader job is a factual wire-display explanation, not instructions to repair electricity. Another objectM has no material label. No mine, manufacturer, real repair-reader feedback or performance result is supplied. The maker wants to keep observed form, provider property/use and an open question separate.
Complete layout and relationships: Multi-sheet text-first mat: source identity and complete neutral source first; four numbered exact prompts follow in order, each above a generous EMPTY own rectangle. Repeat source identity/honest page order if extra pages required; no unreadably shrunken source. No criterion/model/next lesson or answer-hint connector. Source remains complete and readable as text. Digital native source disclosure initially closed has identical whole neutral source; four own fields genuinely empty. Spoken/signed/AAC/verbatim scribing uses exact prompts one at a time if wanted with read-back confirmation.
Visible labels in reading order: V17 A-later neutral supplied fiction Festival repair-label source Read/hear complete source in place 1. Name one supplied visible property of L and one provider-supported property/use link. 2. Separate the observer’s supplied form note from F2’s conduction knowledge and the absent test. 3. Give a source-qualified message for the factual-display reader using a relevant clue and a limit. 4. Ask one purpose-linked new question whose actual answer is not supplied. Own response1 empty Own response2 empty Own response3 empty Own response4 empty Open/close source keeps words; leaving/reload may lose digital drafts Paper records stay on paper
Own-work state: All four own areas empty; no staff key/model/criterion in source help or plane; page splitting never truncates source. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V18
Title
B-later exact source/four-prompt own mat
Full text alternative
V18 — B-later exact source/four-prompt own mat. Original proposed aid. Role: Capture owned responses/decline after actual opportunity with exact whole source/prompt identity in every mode.
Complete visible source: Complete original fictional planter-window account. SketchQ shows pale particles, one root-shaped drawing and spaces; no organism is identified. A supplied water notebook compares samplesQ andR using the same20mL input, cup/filter arrangement and2minute collection window: Qcollected5mL and Rcollected9mL in trial1. It supplies no repeated trials, plant growth, local soil type or drinking-water safety. F3 describes general soil roles for plants, organisms and water; that reference does not identify Q’s actual organisms or prove these setups clean water. The reader job is a useful soil-role and record caption. A new safe viewing plan would leave the display sealed and record the same window area.
Complete layout and relationships: Multi-sheet text-first mat: source identity and complete neutral source first; four numbered exact prompts follow in order, each above a generous EMPTY own rectangle. Repeat source identity/honest page order if extra pages required; no unreadably shrunken source. No criterion/model/next lesson or answer-hint connector. Source remains complete and readable as text. Digital native source disclosure initially closed has identical whole neutral source; four own fields genuinely empty. Spoken/signed/AAC/verbatim scribing uses exact prompts one at a time if wanted with read-back confirmation.
Visible labels in reading order: V18 B-later neutral supplied fiction Planter record window Read/hear complete source in place 1. Give two supplied visible features of Q, retaining what is not identified. 2. Connect one F3 soil role to this reader job and give one record-level limit. 3. Compare the supplied trial1 collected-water records with units and state a different result they do not provide. 4. With a scaffold, propose one safe similar-view step for a further feature comparison and leave its outcome open. Own response1 empty Own response2 empty Own response3 empty Own response4 empty Open/close source keeps words; leaving/reload may lose digital drafts Paper records stay on paper
Own-work state: All four own areas empty; no staff key/model/criterion in source help or plane; page splitting never truncates source. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V19
Title
C-later exact source/four-prompt own mat
Full text alternative
V19 — C-later exact source/four-prompt own mat. Original proposed aid. Role: Capture owned responses/decline after actual opportunity with exact whole source/prompt identity in every mode.
Complete visible source: Complete original fictional path-display diagram account. Trial1 uses the same printed centimetre scale and base direction for drawn strips UandV: Uspans0–4cm; Vspans0–7cm. Before this supplied diagram comparison, the fictional helper predicted V’s drawn base would be longer using its visible longer-looking outline. Trial2’s note says Uwas read along a different diagonal direction, but supplies no length. The reader job is an accurate base-length display, not choosing the strongest paving rock. Real rocks, walking performance and material hardness are not tested. A separate proposed actual plain-paper comparison would align a familiar ruler zero, read the same base direction and record actual cm readings; no new outcome is supplied.
Complete layout and relationships: Multi-sheet text-first mat: source identity and complete neutral source first; four numbered exact prompts follow in order, each above a generous EMPTY own rectangle. Repeat source identity/honest page order if extra pages required; no unreadably shrunken source. No criterion/model/next lesson or answer-hint connector. Source remains complete and readable as text. Digital native source disclosure initially closed has identical whole neutral source; four own fields genuinely empty. Spoken/signed/AAC/verbatim scribing uses exact prompts one at a time if wanted with read-back confirmation.
Visible labels in reading order: V19 C-later neutral supplied fiction Path-display comparison sheet Read/hear complete source in place 1. Compare the supplied trial1 bases with unit and drawing-only scope. 2. Compare trial1’s supplied result with the helper’s explicit before prediction, without calling it your own prior prediction. 3. Keep two faithful trial1 rows and explain why trial2 cannot complete the same base comparison. 4. With guidance, give one fairer base-reading plan step and one further question, leaving the new result open. Own response1 empty Own response2 empty Own response3 empty Own response4 empty Open/close source keeps words; leaving/reload may lose digital drafts Paper records stay on paper
Own-work state: All four own areas empty; no staff key/model/criterion in source help or plane; page splitting never truncates source. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.
Id
V20
Title
D-later exact source/four-prompt own mat
Full text alternative
V20 — D-later exact source/four-prompt own mat. Original proposed aid. Role: Capture owned responses/decline after actual opportunity with exact whole source/prompt identity in every mode.
Complete visible source: Complete original fictional resource-trail visitor account. The display has a supplied soil-water notebook with sampleAcollected6mL and sampleBcollected10mL after the same20mL addition, same cup/filter setup and2minute window in trial1. It supplies no repeats or drinking-water/plant-growth results. A plan reader wants a caption comparing only this recorded collection. F3 separately describes general soil water/habitat/plant roles; it is not these samples’ local result. Fictional readerM says “Bcollected more in this record”; fictional readerN says “Bwill always grow plants better”. No real visitor has replied. A proposed next record would examine a named missing question; its result is empty.
Complete layout and relationships: Multi-sheet text-first mat: source identity and complete neutral source first; four numbered exact prompts follow in order, each above a generous EMPTY own rectangle. Repeat source identity/honest page order if extra pages required; no unreadably shrunken source. No criterion/model/next lesson or answer-hint connector. Source remains complete and readable as text. Digital native source disclosure initially closed has identical whole neutral source; four own fields genuinely empty. Spoken/signed/AAC/verbatim scribing uses exact prompts one at a time if wanted with read-back confirmation.
Visible labels in reading order: V20 D-later neutral supplied fiction Resource-trail visitor record Read/hear complete source in place 1. Use a supplied record to give a bounded explanation for the caption job. 2. Separate F3’s general role from these particular fictional collection records and their missing outcomes. 3. Compare the two fictional reader claims with the complete record, without treating them as actual peer feedback. 4. Ask one useful further evidence question for this accurate caption, leaving its result open. Own response1 empty Own response2 empty Own response3 empty Own response4 empty Open/close source keeps words; leaving/reload may lose digital drafts Paper records stay on paper
Own-work state: All four own areas empty; no staff key/model/criterion in source help or plane; page splitting never truncates source. No hidden sound, colour-only clue, actual experiment, local observation, reader success or automatic verdict. All visible source relationships are given as text; helper reads verbatim and leaves own areas blank.