SubjectNest resource library

Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Year 1 / Science / Term 2 / Weeks 11 12 / Teacher / Examples

Development draft · local review needed

C08 · Two starts and two helpers

Download editable text
Teacher copy · prompts and answer keys

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Complete source: Original fiction. Helper Ari gives a paper piece an intended-little push from the drawn house; it rests near the star. Helper Bea gives another intended-little push starting already near the star; it rests near the square. The same mat is named, but travel measurements, exact contact strength and matched piece history are not supplied. The chosen question is whether Bea used greater force.

Own invitation: What makes this comparison insufficient for that strength question? Propose one useful matching step.

Worked possibility and a different next teaching invitation **Source-supported possibility:** The same “little” label does not measure strength, and the starting positions/operators differ. End positions alone do not supply comparable travelled distances or isolate force. A useful new comparison can use one piece/start/direction and one agreeing operator with bounded intended actions, preserving variations. **Unknown/limits:** Keep every missing force, path, future attempt, actual child operation and player response within this source’s stated limits. A complete fictional record is source evidence, not performed-investigation evidence. **Full next teaching:** Use C07’s four complete same-start/one-operator records. Invite the child to name one relevant match and one remaining unmeasured detail. This different source supports a useful comparison while keeping actual force unknown.
About this resourceReviewed source edition

Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.

Labels and search exclusions are distribution guidance; they do not authenticate or restrict access.

Exact source: 202306f26fcb8ec2153ed100e130bd0d5900e9c5 · 2026-10-13. Source edition, roles and hashes

Complete source and rights notices

Keep these full notices with copies of this resource. Learning text, software, art and outside sources keep their own terms.