Educator selection after teaching, access and exposure review. A/RA first on Day 45 or later; B/RB first on Day 50 or later. Later on Day 50 or later after relevant teaching and first opportunity offered/saved or declined. Missing first leaves comparison unelicited.
Complete selected source
Complete new Paper Gate fiction: at the stated same next story-morning time and same ordinary indoor viewpoint, Jun and Les now each describe the same named open paving patch. Both report visible surface water in that view. They explicitly label matching time, viewpoint and selected surface. No extra difference is reported for that selected agreement question. The earlier sill/patch pair stays separately labelled as different features at its earlier time. No amount, rainfall event/cause, full-day state, actual peer investigation or future result is supplied. Any comparison with a tentative first idea uses the genuine saved contribution; absent remains unelicited.
1. What match and agreement does the new pair report?
2. How does that compare with your saved first idea?
3. What can this pair tell us, and what does it leave unknown?
4. What different useful question would need another source?
Use paper or usual communication. No printer or all-four completion needed. A comparison uses the genuine old contribution, never a model.