Complete supplied source
Original fiction. One household account says Wren made a paper lantern for pretend play in 2001. A display caption says “Everyone made paper lanterns in 2001.” A note written 2024 reports that Wren's source label was attached in 2023. A maker actually wrote “Who drew the pattern?” beside the caption in 2024; the answer is unknown. The maker plans a source-card sleeve but has not made it. No reader feedback is recorded. The lantern/pattern are generic original fictional paper models, not a cultural practice or imported design.
1. Repair the display's everyone claim with a conclusion supported by the source.
Own heading: Repair the display's everyone claim with a conclusion supported by the source.
Look for: One supplied Wren household account describes making a paper lantern in 2001; source cannot support everyone. Keep useful fact/name/date while narrowing scope. Next teaching: Use fresh ordinary C15 one leaf-drawing account to repair an everyone claim. Record actual response/support; do not rehearse this held source/key as next teaching.
2. Which date names label attachment, which names the reporting note, and what happened with the pattern question?
Own heading: Which date names label attachment, which names the reporting note, and what happened with the pattern question?
Look for: Attachment 2023; note written 2024; pattern question actually written 2024; answer unknown. Do not recast written question as merely proposed. Next teaching: Use complete N20 · Added, reported, and asked. Keep added/reporting/written-question labels together with their dates. Read the date words neutrally; the child can use plain-language roles rather than decode numerals. Keep the account’s worked possibilities closed until wanted; record actual response/support and specific next step. This is different ordinary teaching, not rehearsal of this held source/key.
3. Propose one useful source-preserving next step and say whether it is already made or tried.
Own heading: Propose one useful source-preserving next step and say whether it is already made or tried.
Look for: Keep source with caption via sleeve/label arrangement, or another sourced useful modest step; sleeve explicitly unmade and no trial. Proposal stays future until acted. Next teaching: Use complete N21 · A recipe-card pocket is still a plan. Read made/planned/untried as separate labels. Invite a useful child proposal with its honest status; no finished product or trial is demanded. Keep the account’s worked possibilities closed until wanted; record actual response/support and specific next step. This is different ordinary teaching, not rehearsal of this held source/key.
4. Give a short sourced account connecting what is known, the written question and what remains open.
Own heading: Give a short sourced account connecting what is known, the written question and what remains open.
Look for: Brief source-based narrative includes Wren 2001 fact, corrected scope/date jobs or source label, written question and unknown pattern-maker/feedback. Exact equivalent coherent account accepted; no actual learner display inferred. Next teaching: Use complete N22 · Tell the two-page tool-folder story. Offer a spoken mini-tour or a broad two-page layout. Invite a source-connected order in the child’s words. A helper can hold or read pages, but does not fill the unknown. Keep the account’s worked possibilities closed until wanted; record actual response/support and specific next step. This is different ordinary teaching, not rehearsal of this held source/key.
Selection
Eligibility: Full first gate above for this family; complete source/neutral access, actual taught prerequisite and no prior source/key rehearsal.
Complete actual eligibility/first/later/support conditions. Preserve exact child evidence before feedback; use unrelated component teaching, not this key rehearsal. Source-supported alternatives need not use model wording. No score-to-A–E conversion.
Source · Empty own page · Capture.
Sources and reuse · Original educational work © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0. Linked authority/provider exceptions and learner ownership stay separate.