C09 · Six preference tokens · ordinary Day 15Year 4 HASS · T1 W3–4 · Contexts / C09
Source review complete · local suitability still needs review.
Complete source: C09 one fictional session: Sitting 4, Moving 2. Six supplied tokens; no real people.
Three literal claim cards for Day 15 route B: (1) “This card has two more Sitting tokens than Moving tokens.” (2) “This card records six real residents who all chose Moving.” (3) “This card proves the whole town needs more seats.” Choose a source-supported claim and explain why the other claims overreach. Keep these ordinary cards separate from held B requests.
Ordinary educator example — after an own attempt
Worked reasoning after own attempt: Four versus two, difference two. Ask who was invited and what other options existed before generalising.
Limit/next check: No community vote, demographic pattern or inference about future use.
About this resource
Reviewed source editionSource review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.
Exact source: 1275744dad8a13ed5d34bb53863aaedf743a2cfd · 2026-10-12. Source edition, roles and hashes
Complete source and rights notices
Keep these full notices with copies of this resource. Learning text, software, art and outside sources keep their own terms.