# Starlight Centre’s change note · full staff component guide

Complete original fiction; no real participant, measurement, approval, local service or learner result

## Whole source

Source1 · fictional programme: The made-up Starlight Centre lists a paper-story session and a model-drawing session for Thursday in this story. It gives no real dates, opening times, costs or bookings. Source2 · fictional change note: The paper-story session is cancelled in this story. The note says nothing about whether the model-drawing session ran. A draft announcement says: Both Thursday sessions definitely ran. These two sources supply a planned list and a cancellation, not two completed sessions.

## Eligibility and actual help

After actual first-source gap teaching and comparable two-source/update/scope opportunities. Later uses a new programme-and-change relationship; preserve first exposure/help/interval and judge only actually taught components.

Keep actual source exposure, prompt, mode/help, exact own words, interval and intervening teaching. Models are teaching examples, not pupil results or official bands. Select taught eligible components; keep own first words before criteria/models.

## D-later-1

**Exact prompt:** Explain what the programme gives and what the change note changes.

**Original criterion:** Names two planned sessions and cancellation of paper-story, leaving model-drawing completion unreported; distinguishes plan/change from actual running.

**Worked response:** The programme lists two planned sessions. The change note cancels paper-story; it gives no model-drawing running result.

### Complete unrelated next teaching

complete unrelated original ordinary teaching; not a held-source rehearsal, model student or observed result

**Whole source:** Original fictional sport-story pair: A paper schedule plans a ribbon game and a badge-making activity. A later story note cancels the ribbon game. No badge-making completion is reported.

**Child invitation:** Tell the schedule job and the change-note job without inventing an activity result.

**Worked reasoning:** The schedule gives plans; the later note removes one activity. It does not say the other ran.

1. Collect an own two-job account from both complete sources.
2. Model the planned-list/change relationship using the ribbon/badge pair, rather than a trial/legend relationship.
3. Invite another own account that leaves the other activity’s completion open.

**Observable next contribution:** The own account distinguishes planned activities, one cancellation and an unknown completion.

[Complete next offer](../next/D-later-1.md)

## D-later-2

**Exact prompt:** Repair the draft announcement using a relevant detail from each source.

**Original criterion:** Own repair links the two planned sessions with paper-story cancellation and keeps drawing’s running result open; no definitely-both result.

**Worked response:** Two sessions were planned, but paper-story was cancelled; the sources do not say whether model-drawing ran.

### Complete unrelated next teaching

complete unrelated original ordinary teaching; not a held-source rehearsal, model student or observed result

**Whole source:** Invented bakery-story pair: A pretend notice plans a cake-sketch display and a recipe-reading corner. A change note cancels the display. The supplied record reports no recipe-reading event. No food preparation or tasting is required.

**Child invitation:** Repair Both activities definitely happened using the supplied pair.

**Worked reasoning:** The notice planned both; the display was cancelled, and recipe-reading completion is not supplied.

1. Retain an own repair and point/direct to a relevant detail in each full source.
2. Model but as a contrast between programme and cancellation, not proof that the other happened.
3. Invite new own linked wording with the other event unreported.

**Observable next contribution:** The own repair uses both sources and does not imply the other activity ran.

[Complete next offer](../next/D-later-2.md)

## D-later-3

**Exact prompt:** Ask one relevant question a reader still needs answered from these sources.

**Original criterion:** Own question targets a genuinely unreported drawing-session result or replacement/updated plan; does not demand a speculative answer or real booking action.

**Worked response:** Did the model-drawing session run, or was there another change note?

### Complete unrelated next teaching

complete unrelated original ordinary teaching; not a held-source rehearsal, model student or observed result

**Whole source:** Fictional concert-story pair: A programme lists a humming scene and a silent-drawing scene. A later note cancels the humming scene. It gives no replacement or silent-drawing result.

**Child invitation:** Ask one useful question the pair leaves open.

**Worked reasoning:** Was a replacement planned? or Did the silent-drawing scene run? is a relevant missing detail, not a reported event.

1. Keep an own question before a model.
2. Show how an unanswered question comes from a particular gap in the two sources.
3. Invite a different own question and keep its answer blank until evidence exists; no performance or hearing task required.

**Observable next contribution:** The own question is specific to an unreported result or update.

[Complete next offer](../next/D-later-3.md)

## D-later-4

**Exact prompt:** Write or compose a short reader guide with the original plan, the change and one useful limit or question.

**Original criterion:** Own linked informative product keeps planned sessions, paper-story cancellation and one unreported-result limit/question; reader purpose is clear without a real-service promise.

**Worked response:** The fictional programme planned two sessions. Paper-story was cancelled, and the drawing-session result is still open; a reader would need another update.

### Complete unrelated next teaching

complete unrelated original ordinary teaching; not a held-source rehearsal, model student or observed result

**Whole source:** Original model-museum pair: A story programme plans a puppet talk and a label-making corner. A later note cancels the talk and gives no label-corner result. Nothing is a real museum listing.

**Child invitation:** Help a private reader understand the plan and update in a tiny guide.

**Worked reasoning:** A linked guide can name both plans, the cancelled talk and the unknown label-corner result without promising a real visit.

1. Choose a private reader purpose and retain the own first guide.
2. Model programme/change/unknown jobs using the full model-museum pair, with paragraph grouping if useful.
3. Invite another own written/drawn/spoken/AAC guide; record actual composition/writing/delivery support.

**Observable next contribution:** The own new guide links programme, update and open result for a reader.

[Complete next offer](../next/D-later-4.md)