SubjectNest · Year 3 Science · Term 1 · Weeks 09–10 · sequence Days 41–50

N24 · Art-plan same-view comparison

Child invitation

Plan a toy-map comparison without claiming a result.

Four teacher moves

Guided different complete source

Different fictional toy-map plan asks about arrow placement while keeping the same map/view area. No reader trial is supplied. Invite one safe paper-view step and matching factor with its new outcome open.

Id

N24

Mode limit

These are supported teaching opportunities after component review. Reasoning from a supplied account, a model and actual child conduct are different evidence. A helper operation is attributed; declining, length or format is not an ability diagnosis or grade.

Next decision

If this distinction is still unclear, return to one source-labelled heading pair in this new account and one question. If clear, offer a genuinely fresh ordinary job after further learning. Do not rehearse the held key and call its repetition untouched first/later evidence.

Observable evidence

Child gives a relevant safe similarity/view plan and retains actual conduct/result gaps.

Ordinary staff possible model

Review the same page area after the planned border change; no reader result yet.

Teacher preparation

Read the complete new source and different guided account below; prepare large paper headings and a genuinely empty own response area. The accounts are original supplied fiction, not a verified local event. Offer spoken/signed/AAC, pointing with confirmed read-back, drawing or verbatim scribing. No specialised equipment, media recording, purchases or public sharing is needed.

Title

Art-plan same-view comparison

Whole unrelated source

Fictional art-display plan asks how a border change affects a reader’s picture view. Paper layouts are available but no reader observation exists. The safe plan keeps the page/view spot similar.