# Day49 · Make it useful for your reader

## Complete source

Ordinary fictional community-show preparation. Sami chooses a foil making trail for a younger reader, a soil-role door for a family visitor, or a copper-wire fact card for a repair-display reader. The brief asks for one source-labelled resource explanation, one visible or supplied property clue with its provenance, and one open question. A pretend reader note says “I can't tell which bit you saw.” This note is fictional feedback, not a child-tested outcome. A real invited adult or peer may give different feedback or none.

## Day

49

## Evidence

Purpose/audience, faithful provenance and reasoned owner-chosen revision. Format choice is not a diagnosis or guaranteed success; real feedback requires a real participant.

## Moves

- Invite, 3 minutes: let learners choose who the trail is for and whether to share publicly, privately or only with a helper.
- Read, 5 minutes: read the complete brief and fictional reader note. Return to the relevant full ordinary source/F card, not a slogan or cropped picture.
- Model, 5 minutes: revise an ordinary foil caption for the missing provenance. Label the version before and after, and identify the reason; do not claim a real reader liked it.
- Try together, 5 minutes: ask what a younger reader might need to understand a soil habitat role. Distinguish your prediction about their need from feedback actually obtained.
- Make, 15–20 minutes: follow one route. Keep two own versions if wanted, compare a chosen difference and record keep/change/open with a reason. In paper work cross out or annotate only by owner choice.
- Return, 5 minutes: invite a real reader's question if available and wanted. Preserve exact attribution and support; a private or incomplete product remains a legitimate learning opportunity.

## Next teaching

For a source-hidden revision use C17. For feedback assumed from silence use C18. Offer one targeted revision rather than remaking the whole product or revealing an unrelated held key.

## Ordinary staff model

Possible ordinary revision: “F1 names the aluminium-making route. I observed the fold in our card; I did not observe ore processing.” The added provenance phrase responds to the pretend note. A different chosen reader may need larger labels or an oral explanation instead of more text.

## Question

What would someone be able to do with your trail?

## Routes

### Complete instruction

Make a small paper gallery card for your chosen object/role. Add source identity, clue provenance, use/importance and an open question. Use a mini-book, flap or large display label. Invite one reader only if you want; leave reader feedback empty if none occurred.

### Id

D49-1

### Title

Trail gallery

### Complete instruction

Offer the same explanation as large tactile heading cards, a signed/spoken/AAC briefing or a helper-read script. Ask an actual reader what they need if they participate; otherwise label the proposed access choice as your design choice. Keep the science relationship when changing format.

### Id

D49-2

### Title

Access designer

### Complete instruction

Use the Desk or paper twin to keep two explicitly chosen own versions. Choose them by their distinct labels in the comparison columns. Inspect one change in Source/Claim/Reader views, then enter your own reason. No automatic quality score or assistant suggestion appears.

### Id

D49-3

### Title

Two-version compare

## Title

Make it useful for your reader