Use this case
Offer the neutral source and four questions after the relevant learning opportunity. Keep staff examples and next teaching on the teacher pages.
Child materials and paper
- D-later · complete neutral source
- D-later · four questions and own response spaces
- D-later · complete source and four empty paper questions
- D-later · matching vector mat (V20)
- D-later · full vector text alternative (V20)
After reviewing the child’s own work
Choose the relevant next lesson. These are supported teaching accounts, separate from the child’s case responses.
Complete neutral source
Complete original fictional resource-trail visitor account. The display has a supplied soil-water notebook with sampleAcollected6mL and sampleBcollected10mL after the same20mL addition, same cup/filter setup and2minute window in trial1. It supplies no repeats or drinking-water/plant-growth results. A plan reader wants a caption comparing only this recorded collection. F3 separately describes general soil water/habitat/plant roles; it is not these samples’ local result. Fictional readerM says “Bcollected more in this record”; fictional readerN says “Bwill always grow plants better”. No real visitor has replied. A proposed next record would examine a named missing question; its result is empty.
Components
Acceptance
Other source-faithful responses in words/drawing/spoken/signed/AAC/exact scribing are legitimate. Apply only this prompt and criterion; no unstated physical action, measured result, word quota or exact model wording. Record actual support and source exposure.
Exact criterion
ParticularA6/B10mLcomparison tied tocollectioncaption/setup/trial; no bestsoil/growthclaim.
Exact prompt
Use a supplied record to give a bounded explanation for the caption job.
Full unrelated next lesson
Child invitation
Give the shop reader a record-based label-count explanation.
Four teacher moves
- Read the entire new source with its names, times, conditions and unknowns. Ask one initial meaning question before showing the staff possibility. Let the child ask to hear the whole source again or pass.
- Model data→exact quantity explanation→reader job and separate the different real outcome.
- Read the complete different guided account below. Guide one heading or source location, then pause for the child to make their own distinction. Keep the original worked example separate; no model sentence is inserted into their own work.
- Invite the exact child job below. Record the observable distinction, actual source, mode, support and any unperformed work. Give feedback about one chosen clue, then decide whether another unrelated new opportunity is useful.
Guided different complete source
Different fictional shop-window notebook shows2paper price labels onR and5onS in display1. The job is comparing display labels, not sales. Invite a bounded count explanation for that purpose.
Id
N29
Mode limit
These are supported teaching opportunities after component review. Reasoning from a supplied account, a model and actual child conduct are different evidence. A helper operation is attributed; declining, length or format is not an ability diagnosis or grade.
Next decision
If this distinction is still unclear, return to one source-labelled heading pair in this new account and one question. If clear, offer a genuinely fresh ordinary job after further learning. Do not rehearse the held key and call its repetition untouched first/later evidence.
Observable evidence
Child links particular data to a useful purpose without inferring a different unrecorded outcome.
Ordinary staff possible model
Qhas3more paper tickets in layout1; the record does not show passenger use.
Teacher preparation
Read the complete new source and different guided account below; prepare large paper headings and a genuinely empty own response area. The accounts are original supplied fiction, not a verified local event. Offer spoken/signed/AAC, pointing with confirmed read-back, drawing or verbatim scribing. No specialised equipment, media recording, purchases or public sharing is needed.
Title
Train-display ticket record for a purpose
Whole unrelated source
Fictional train-display notebook counts4paper tickets on panelP and7onQ in layout1. The job is a label comparing paper display items, not actual passengers.
Id
D-later-1
Initial own value
One staff possible response
Bcollected4mL more than A in this supplied trial; that explains a collection caption, not which soil grows plants best.
Acceptance
Other source-faithful responses in words/drawing/spoken/signed/AAC/exact scribing are legitimate. Apply only this prompt and criterion; no unstated physical action, measured result, word quota or exact model wording. Record actual support and source exposure.
Exact criterion
Generalsoilrole, specificfictionentries and absentgrowth/safety/repeats distinct.
Exact prompt
Separate F3’s general role from these particular fictional collection records and their missing outcomes.
Full unrelated next lesson
Child invitation
Help the art reader separate role, made drawing and missing viewer response.
Four teacher moves
- Read the entire new source with its names, times, conditions and unknowns. Ask one initial meaning question before showing the staff possibility. Let the child ask to hear the whole source again or pass.
- Model general information, particular record and missing outcome as separate lanes.
- Read the complete different guided account below. Guide one heading or source location, then pause for the child to make their own distinction. Keep the original worked example separate; no model sentence is inserted into their own work.
- Invite the exact child job below. Record the observable distinction, actual source, mode, support and any unperformed work. Give feedback about one chosen clue, then decide whether another unrelated new opportunity is useful.
Guided different complete source
Different fictional art guide says pictures can communicate ideas; a particular notebook records one drawing made but no viewer reply. Invite role/record/absent-response distinctions without inventing feedback.
Id
N30
Mode limit
These are supported teaching opportunities after component review. Reasoning from a supplied account, a model and actual child conduct are different evidence. A helper operation is attributed; declining, length or format is not an ability diagnosis or grade.
Next decision
If this distinction is still unclear, return to one source-labelled heading pair in this new account and one question. If clear, offer a genuinely fresh ordinary job after further learning. Do not rehearse the held key and call its repetition untouched first/later evidence.
Observable evidence
Child distinguishes general source information, particular supplied record and unsupported performance claims.
Ordinary staff possible model
The guide gives a general role; the sheet does not prove a group played or enjoyed it.
Teacher preparation
Read the complete new source and different guided account below; prepare large paper headings and a genuinely empty own response area. The accounts are original supplied fiction, not a verified local event. Offer spoken/signed/AAC, pointing with confirmed read-back, drawing or verbatim scribing. No specialised equipment, media recording, purchases or public sharing is needed.
Title
General play role and particular game record
Whole unrelated source
Fictional guide says games can offer shared play. A particular game sheet records one rule written, with no player or enjoyment evidence.
Id
D-later-2
Initial own value
One staff possible response
F3 gives general soil roles; A/B are supplied collection entries, with growth, safety and repeats absent.
Acceptance
Other source-faithful responses in words/drawing/spoken/signed/AAC/exact scribing are legitimate. Apply only this prompt and criterion; no unstated physical action, measured result, word quota or exact model wording. Record actual support and source exposure.
Exact criterion
Mmorecollection supported; Nalwaysgrowth unsupported; wholetrialscope/fictional status retained.
Exact prompt
Compare the two fictional reader claims with the complete record, without treating them as actual peer feedback.
Full unrelated next lesson
Child invitation
Compare the craft-market claims without inventing shopper feedback.
Four teacher moves
- Read the entire new source with its names, times, conditions and unknowns. Ask one initial meaning question before showing the staff possibility. Let the child ask to hear the whole source again or pass.
- Model claim-by-claim tracing to the complete notebook, preserving missing use and fictional voices.
- Read the complete different guided account below. Guide one heading or source location, then pause for the child to make their own distinction. Keep the original worked example separate; no model sentence is inserted into their own work.
- Invite the exact child job below. Record the observable distinction, actual source, mode, support and any unperformed work. Give feedback about one chosen clue, then decide whether another unrelated new opportunity is useful.
Guided different complete source
Different fictional craft-market notebook records two signs made, visitor row empty. Story readerR says signs exist; S says all shoppers used them. Invite the child to compare both claims with the actual supplied record and keep their story status.
Id
N31
Mode limit
These are supported teaching opportunities after component review. Reasoning from a supplied account, a model and actual child conduct are different evidence. A helper operation is attributed; declining, length or format is not an ability diagnosis or grade.
Next decision
If this distinction is still unclear, return to one source-labelled heading pair in this new account and one question. If clear, offer a genuinely fresh ordinary job after further learning. Do not rehearse the held key and call its repetition untouched first/later evidence.
Observable evidence
Child evaluates supplied claims against record scope and keeps imagined voices separate from actual peer/reader interaction.
Ordinary staff possible model
A matches printing; B’s universal user claim lacks evidence. The story readers are fictional.
Teacher preparation
Read the complete new source and different guided account below; prepare large paper headings and a genuinely empty own response area. The accounts are original supplied fiction, not a verified local event. Offer spoken/signed/AAC, pointing with confirmed read-back, drawing or verbatim scribing. No specialised equipment, media recording, purchases or public sharing is needed.
Title
Music-poster views without music trial
Whole unrelated source
Fictional poster notebook reports one large title printed. Story readerA says it is printed; readerB says every concert visitor read it. There is no visitor record or music performance.
Id
D-later-3
Initial own value
One staff possible response
Mfits B10mL/A6mL. N’s always-better growth claim is unsupported by this collection notebook; both readers are fictional.
Acceptance
Other source-faithful responses in words/drawing/spoken/signed/AAC/exact scribing are legitimate. Apply only this prompt and criterion; no unstated physical action, measured result, word quota or exact model wording. Record actual support and source exposure.
Exact criterion
Question relates torecordrepeat/conditions/differentneededquantity/purpose; noactualtest oruniversalresult required.
Exact prompt
Ask one useful further evidence question for this accurate caption, leaving its result open.
Full unrelated next lesson
Child invitation
Choose a museum-card question whose answer needs new evidence.
Four teacher moves
- Read the entire new source with its names, times, conditions and unknowns. Ask one initial meaning question before showing the staff possibility. Let the child ask to hear the whole source again or pass.
- Model purpose-linked enquiry with blank future reply and optional participation, keeping instruction quality distinct from no feedback.
- Read the complete different guided account below. Guide one heading or source location, then pause for the child to make their own distinction. Keep the original worked example separate; no model sentence is inserted into their own work.
- Invite the exact child job below. Record the observable distinction, actual source, mode, support and any unperformed work. Give feedback about one chosen clue, then decide whether another unrelated new opportunity is useful.
Guided different complete source
Different fictional museum card has one source identity written but no date check or reader response. Invite a useful source/date/reader question for the card and leave the actual search or reply open.
Id
N32
Mode limit
These are supported teaching opportunities after component review. Reasoning from a supplied account, a model and actual child conduct are different evidence. A helper operation is attributed; declining, length or format is not an ability diagnosis or grade.
Next decision
If this distinction is still unclear, return to one source-labelled heading pair in this new account and one question. If clear, offer a genuinely fresh ordinary job after further learning. Do not rehearse the held key and call its repetition untouched first/later evidence.
Observable evidence
Child forms a relevant further question and preserves unperformed search/feedback/outcome status.
Ordinary staff possible model
What would a willing reader ask about the first instruction? No reply is supplied.
Teacher preparation
Read the complete new source and different guided account below; prepare large paper headings and a genuinely empty own response area. The accounts are original supplied fiction, not a verified local event. Offer spoken/signed/AAC, pointing with confirmed read-back, drawing or verbatim scribing. No specialised equipment, media recording, purchases or public sharing is needed.
Title
Helpful-label further evidence question
Whole unrelated source
Fictional label notebook records one caption written but no willing-reader use. Its owner wants to make the instructions helpful.
Id
D-later-4
Initial own value
One staff possible response
Would further matched collection records show the same pattern, or what new evidence would address growth separately? Neither result is supplied.
Eligibility
Offer only after relevant actual teaching opportunity; first capture/decline precedes its corresponding later source and all staff keys. Record source familiarity, earlier answer exposure, child/adult operations, wording help, mode, actual versus supplied/model evidence and time/order. Coached reuse is teaching, not untouched evidence.
Exact four prompts
- Use a supplied record to give a bounded explanation for the caption job.
- Separate F3’s general role from these particular fictional collection records and their missing outcomes.
- Compare the two fictional reader claims with the complete record, without treating them as actual peer feedback.
- Ask one useful further evidence question for this accurate caption, leaving its result open.
Id
D-later
Learner door
Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help.
Own values
Source kind
Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied.
Title
Resource-trail visitor record