N10 · Reading-label plan
Id
N10
Original component
C-first-Q2
Target criterion
Correctly compares 304 and 340, reporting 340 as greater and explaining the highest place where their values differ.
New job title
Reading-label plan
Source
Fictional label quantities: Reading-label plan. First card: 415 labels. Second card: 451 labels. Third card: 514 labels. All three count the same kind of label; these are supplied counts, not actual stock or money. Use the whole values to represent, compare or order them. Own responses remain open.
Mathematical data
Source
Fictional label quantities: Reading-label plan. First card: 415 labels. Second card: 451 labels. Third card: 514 labels. All three count the same kind of label; these are supplied counts, not actual stock or money. Use the whole values to represent, compare or order them. Own responses remain open.
Values
415
451
514
Alternative first parts
Not supplied.
Claim
Models
415 = 4 hundreds + 1 ten + 5 ones = 400 + 10 + 5.
451 = 4 hundreds + 5 tens + 1 one = 400 + 50 + 1.
514 = 5 hundreds + 1 ten + 4 ones = 500 + 10 + 4.
Ordered
415
451
514
Invitation
Compare the first and second whole quantities and explain the highest differing place.
Teacher moves
Read both complete quantities on Reading-label plan. Name the hundreds, tens and ones in both numerals. Compare the highest place whose value differs; lower-place digits cannot override it. Model a checking reason, then receive a different pair without the earlier comparison answer.
Worked possible response
451 is greater. 415 = 4 hundreds + 1 ten + 5 ones = 400 + 10 + 5. 451 = 4 hundreds + 5 tens + 1 one = 400 + 50 + 1.
Guided source
Fictional label quantities: Reading-label plan—new guided cards. First card: 628 labels. Second card: 682 labels. Third card: 826 labels. All three count the same kind of label; these are supplied counts, not actual stock or money. Use the whole values to represent, compare or order them. Own responses remain open.
Guided data
Source
Fictional label quantities: Reading-label plan—new guided cards. First card: 628 labels. Second card: 682 labels. Third card: 826 labels. All three count the same kind of label; these are supplied counts, not actual stock or money. Use the whole values to represent, compare or order them. Own responses remain open.
Values
628
682
826
Alternative first parts
Not supplied.
Claim
Models
628 = 6 hundreds + 2 tens + 8 ones = 600 + 20 + 8.
682 = 6 hundreds + 8 tens + 2 ones = 600 + 80 + 2.
826 = 8 hundreds + 2 tens + 6 ones = 800 + 20 + 6.
Ordered
628
682
826
Guided invitation
Compare the first and second whole quantities and explain the highest differing place.
Guided staff possible response
682 is greater. 628 = 6 hundreds + 2 tens + 8 ones = 600 + 20 + 8. 682 = 6 hundreds + 8 tens + 2 ones = 600 + 80 + 2.
Receive own steps
Read/hear the whole new source and name the actual requested job.
Receive the learner’s own idea in their usual communication before the staff response.
Teach the precise relationship using the separate complete model; name mathematical hints.
Deliver the complete different guided source and invitation. Receive a fresh response before its staff possibility.
Review criterion
Reports the correct greater whole and a highest-differing-place reason.
Observe and next
Record the exact relationship available in the response and the help, leaving absent evidence open. If it is missing, repeat that same relationship on a smaller complete source. If secure, change the scene/quantity or representation explicitly; do not infer annual mastery.
Access
Point, speak, sign, AAC, tactile labels, large marks or exact child-directed scribing/moving. No speed, handwriting, robot, printing or public sharing criterion.
Transfer limit
Different supplied complete new and guided contexts; no remembered original held source or real learner improvement is claimed.
Grant
Original © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, SubjectNest, CC BY4.0.