## C18 · A fold-game idea waits

**Complete source:** Original fiction. A maker plans a quiet fold-game with a broad paper bend as a picture stand and a spoken rule instead of tiny writing. The idea is described on a note, but no stand is made, action tried or player response recorded. The maker wonders which instruction a willing player would want explained. No diagnosis or universal access preference is named.

**Own invitation:** What useful next question fits this plan without claiming it is already tested?

<details>
<summary>Worked possibility and a different next teaching invitation</summary>

**Source-supported possibility:** The note describes a plan; stand/action/player result remain open. Asking which instruction a willing player wants clarified is useful. The spoken option is a proposal, not proof it suits every person or that the untried game failed.

**Unknown/limits:** Keep every missing force, path, future attempt, actual child operation and player response within this source’s stated limits. A complete fictional record is source evidence, not performed-investigation evidence.

**Full next teaching:** Use C10’s actually written invitation, planned second picture and missing reply. Invite one happened/planned/not-recorded label and a relevant reader question. Observe honest status, with no fabricated trial or learner diagnosis.

</details>