Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Day59 · Two players, two kinds of statement

Useful job: Compare what was observed with what a game rule asks for, without inventing a player’s experience.

Target opportunity: AC9S1U03 / AC9S1H01 / AC9S1I01 / AC9S1I05 / AC9S1I06. Complete ordinary sources: C17/C18; their full original fictional bodies and separate worked/next accounts are in ORDINARY.md. Use the full curriculum/reference module for scope; code labels are not attained criteria.

Six teaching moves

1. Read C17’s two complete descriptions of the same resting card and the written boundary rule. Ask whether the observations agree and whether the rule settles the score.

2. Keep observing position, interpreting a rule and preferring a game separate. Both supplied descriptions can be true without proving how a real child feels.

3. Model C18’s untried invitation. The proposed spoken rule and paper stand are next ideas, not an observation or guaranteed improvement.

4. Choose a clue interview, a boundary-rule designer or a private player question. An actual willing reader/player is optional; no fabricated peer comparison or mandatory social performance.

5. Invite a question that would make the record or rule clearer. Let the child choose a new proposed rule, while preserving the original one as original information.

6. Check agreement, ambiguity and status. If a learner invents a winner or universal preference, return to the source’s missing rule detail or response. A useful question can finish the activity.

Three engagement choices

Route59.1 · Ask the clue-makers. Using C17, child asks imaginary note-makers one question about their shared observation. Adult answers from the source only. No real disagreement, dishonesty or social deficit is inferred.

Route59.2 · Boundary-rule designer. Read C17. Child proposes whether touching the boundary counts and gives a reason linked to the wanted game. Mark this as a new rule; the old source had not decided it.

Route59.3 · Private player question. Use C18 or a genuinely available own invitation. Child makes a useful question about instructions or experience. Keep any reply empty until an actual reply exists; no account, contact or public sharing is required.

Small check: Distinguishes agreeing position reports from an unresolved rule/experience question and labels a new proposal honestly.

Targeted next teaching: Use C17 for observation-versus-rule confusion; use C18 for proposed-versus-tried claims. Missing reply is unknown, not proof the game failed.

Finish invitation: “Would you keep this, change something, ask a question, or finish?”