D-first · A paper train-station rule

Matched criterion: Both supplied descriptions can coexist; absent rule does not make an observation false or establish a score/winner.

Source-supported worked possibility: Yes. A ticket can touch the boundary while part remains outside. Whether it counts is a missing rule question.

Do not infer: Actual force, an unperformed action, unseen path, future result, score or player reply cannot be added. Only this source’s supplied facts and a clearly labelled own provisional idea count for the selected relation. A worked possibility is not the learner’s required wording.

Complete unrelated next source · A boundary at a pretend café: Original unrelated fiction. A broad paper menu rests partly over a drawn reading-place line and touches the line. The rule says arrive at the reading place without defining inside/touching. No score.

Own next invitation: Can touching and partly outside both fit? What rule word is missing?

Full next teaching sequence: Read the two location descriptions separately. Use a broad drawing without a score mark. Invite the learner to relate both and ask about the rule; do not favour touching or inside as a universal preference.

Observe and decide: Descriptions coexist; absent boundary rule is distinguished from wrong observed location. Record exact response/route/help and the actual account offered. If this selected relation is not yet elicited, offer one source moment or question in smaller turns and revisit the same target before changing the held source. If it is communicated, select a different useful purpose or missing result for transfer; do not require extra writing or claim whole-concept mastery. The later held response remains separate and is recorded only when actually offered.

Own response space: ________________________________

Matched criterion: Retains child-character question and helper exact recording; not an actual trial, player reply or the respondent’s observed performance.

Source-supported worked possibility: The child-character asked about deciding boundary touching before the next turn. The helper wrote the same words; no next turn is supplied.

Do not infer: Actual force, an unperformed action, unseen path, future result, score or player reply cannot be added. Only this source’s supplied facts and a clearly labelled own provisional idea count for the selected relation. A worked possibility is not the learner’s required wording.

Complete unrelated next source · A dictated request for a helper: Original unrelated fiction. A child-character asks “Could you read this picture rule aloud?” A helper writes those exact words. No reading, answer or game trial has yet happened.

Own next invitation: What has each person done, and what remains unperformed?

Full next teaching sequence: Read the exact request once neutrally. Let the learner identify child-character ownership and helper recording. Distinguish asking, writing and actually reading rather than treating a request as completed help.

Observe and decide: Request belongs to child-character; helper has recorded it only; reading/reply/game use absent. Record exact response/route/help and the actual account offered. If this selected relation is not yet elicited, offer one source moment or question in smaller turns and revisit the same target before changing the held source. If it is communicated, select a different useful purpose or missing result for transfer; do not require extra writing or claim whole-concept mastery. The later held response remains separate and is recorded only when actually offered.

Own response space: ________________________________

Matched criterion: Communicates source-relevant boundary-rule uncertainty with a plausible own message/question; no imagined reply, compulsory peer, writing or correct universal rule.

Source-supported worked possibility: “Do you want touching to count in this game?” is useful. “The rule does not say yet; shall we decide?” is another. The player’s own answer is absent.

Do not infer: Actual force, an unperformed action, unseen path, future result, score or player reply cannot be added. Only this source’s supplied facts and a clearly labelled own provisional idea count for the selected relation. A worked possibility is not the learner’s required wording.

Complete unrelated next source · A player chooses whether to join: Original unrelated fiction. A maker has a paper parking-game sketch and asks a fictional player whether they want to try, change or leave it. No reply or trial is provided.

Own next invitation: Give your own kind useful invitation without filling their answer.

Full next teaching sequence: Offer a private spoken/sign/AAC invitation or large picture choice. Let the learner choose wording rather than use a supplied reply. Explicitly leave a player-answer space blank, with no diagnosis or preference assumption.

Observe and decide: Own invitation supports choice and preserves absent reply; participation and public speaking are not required. Record exact response/route/help and the actual account offered. If this selected relation is not yet elicited, offer one source moment or question in smaller turns and revisit the same target before changing the held source. If it is communicated, select a different useful purpose or missing result for transfer; do not require extra writing or claim whole-concept mastery. The later held response remains separate and is recorded only when actually offered.

Own response space: ________________________________

Matched criterion: Distinguishes supplied ticket rest/question/recording from absent next turn/player reply/score; cannot add a score or future success.

Source-supported worked possibility: The ticket touches the boundary and is not wholly inside. A later turn’s rest or a player’s reply is not supplied.

Do not infer: Actual force, an unperformed action, unseen path, future result, score or player reply cannot be added. Only this source’s supplied facts and a clearly labelled own provisional idea count for the selected relation. A worked possibility is not the learner’s required wording.

Complete unrelated next source · A plan beside a real record: Original unrelated fiction. A paper cue notebook supplies one helper pull with nearer rest, plus an unperformed second-push plan. Force, next rest and a reader reply are absent.

Own next invitation: Name a recorded event and a still-open result.

Full next teaching sequence: Read the event and plan with their status words. Offer two empty headings record and proposed. Invite one supported distinction and repeat source neutrally if wanted; no after answer is supplied for the plan.

Observe and decide: Actual helper pull/nearer rest remains distinct from absent second-push outcome and reader experience. Record exact response/route/help and the actual account offered. If this selected relation is not yet elicited, offer one source moment or question in smaller turns and revisit the same target before changing the held source. If it is communicated, select a different useful purpose or missing result for transfer; do not require extra writing or claim whole-concept mastery. The later held response remains separate and is recorded only when actually offered.

Own response space: ________________________________