The snack-picture model — separate staff criteria

Complete supplied source

Original fiction. A paper snack-picture table stands beside a return tray. Model helpers returned broad picture cards to the tray. Fictional speaker Quinn says, “I want the tray easy to find.” Speaker Tess says, “I want a clear place to draw.” The model organiser is Mika. A new tray arrow is proposed and needs Mika’s decision; no decision is recorded. Reader Val looked for the tray label, but the source gives no result of that lookup. There is no real food handling, permission, diagnosis or actual child test.

Read the complete source below or its separate page exactly. The examples are possible answers, not required wording. Do not judge fine-motor skill, public confidence or independent decoding; note supplied source words separately from child connections.

1. What does each person want? Tell one connection or difference.

• Look for: Attributes Quinn’s finding purpose and Tess’s drawing-space purpose; discusses a supported connection or difference, not name matching alone.
• Possible example: Quinn wants to find the tray; Tess wants room to draw. Both concern the model table area, but their purposes differ.
• Specific next help: If names alone are repeated, use two unrelated ordinary exact wishes and discuss what each person wants to do.

2. What does the story say was done? What is still unknown?

• Look for: Identifies a reported action or actual supplied lookup and a genuinely omitted decision/result; does not infer no try from missing result.
• Possible example: Helpers returned cards. Val looked for the label, but we do not know what happened. Mika’s decision is also unknown.
• Specific next help: If unknown lookup result is called untried, use an unrelated note explicitly saying someone looked but no result was kept; separate action from result.

3. Suggest one small care idea. Which clue helps?

• Look for: Proposes a modest supported model care choice, or justified no change; keeps source purpose and needed decision separate from completion.
• Possible example: Suggest a broad tray label because Quinn wants it easy to find; Mika would need to decide. Other supported modest ideas/no-change reasons are acceptable.
• Specific next help: If an idea lacks a clue or is claimed installed, use unrelated clue/idea/check slips and explicitly name the proposal rather than reported action.

4. Tell a little care story. Keep a source clue and something not told.

• Look for: Develops a linked short account using source detail and subject terms, while preserving an omitted result/decision as unknown.
• Possible example: Helpers returned the cards to the tray. Quinn wants to find it. We do not know Val’s lookup result. Exact wording and length can vary.
• Specific next help: If only a title or copied isolated word is offered, neutrally reread an unrelated short source, invite one detail plus a connection, and preserve the child’s actual account.

Whole supplied diagram · Full no-image source

Exact source questions · Empty own spaces · Selection/capture. Sources and reuse. Original activity; selected guidance Modified from linked © State of Queensland (QCAA) 2023 under CC BY 4.0 and document exceptions. No official rating or endorsement.