{"$schema":"https://neuroforge.io/schemas/evidence-catalog-v1.schema.json","contract":"neuroforge.evidence_catalog.v1","interpretation":{"completeness_is_scientific_confidence":false,"partial_is_supported":false,"projections_are_measurements":false},"quality_checks":["controlled_vocabularies","cross_pack_relations","finite_chart_values","row_series_cardinality","dual_surface_chart_contrast","redundant_colour_shape_pattern_encoding","metric_and_chart_source_lineage","deterministic_chart_csv_exports","projection_classification","method_and_claim_boundaries","evidence_currency_and_next_gate","held_release_cannot_label_evidence_current","search_publication_gate"],"evidence_release":{"id":"nf-erais-public-2026-07-28-terminal-v1","publication_state":"hold_pending_assembly_ci","reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","manifest":"/erais/proof/public_evidence_release.json","schema":"/schemas/evidence-release-v1.schema.json"},"packs":[{"id":"state-of-play","title":"Engineering inventory snapshot","route":"/erais/proof/state-of-play/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/state_of_play/state_summary.json","category":"Engineering controls","evidence_class":"control","posture":"reviewed","currency":"stale","currency_reason":"The inventory and curated claim presentation predate the current registry and active research state.","next_evidence":"Regenerate state of play after the claim, phase, fracture, and evidence releases close at one approved exact SHA.","decision_relevance":["diligence","research"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-12T09:16:00Z","finding":"At the recorded boundary, the engineering inventory and exact-reconstruction anchor were visible while sparse alignment remained the active proof gate.","caveat":"This snapshot is not the live claim register. Inventory scale and completed engineering gates do not establish material-sparse quality, performance, or production readiness.","related":["review-readiness","quality-gates"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/state_of_play/state_summary.json"},{"label":"Historical presentation subset values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/state-of-play/claim-maturity.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"source-files","label":"Source files indexed","display":"387","context":"Tracked repository inventory; not a quality score.","source_field":"headline.source_files"},{"id":"test-files","label":"Test files indexed","display":"598","context":"Coverage surface, not proof that every behavior is correct.","source_field":"headline.test_files"},{"id":"governed-claims","label":"Governed claims indexed","display":"44","context":"Registry inventory at the recorded snapshot; see /claims/ for the current complete public tier.","source_field":"headline.registered_claims"},{"id":"report-artifacts","label":"Report artifacts indexed","display":"750","context":"Traceability inventory; evidence strength is assessed separately.","source_field":"headline.report_artifacts_indexed"}],"charts":[{"id":"claim-maturity","kind":"status","title":"Historical presentation subset","description":"The nine-claim presentation subset recorded by this timestamped pack; it is not the current complete public claim tier.","finding":"At this snapshot, two presentation claims were supported, six were partial, and one was explicitly blocked.","unit":"claims","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/state-of-play/claim-maturity.csv","source_fields":["headline.supported_public_claims","headline.partial_public_claims","headline.blocked_public_claims"],"series":[{"label":"Count","color":"#53636a","tone":"neutral"}],"rows":[{"label":"Supported","tone":"positive","values":[2]},{"label":"Partial","tone":"warning","values":[6]},{"label":"Blocked","tone":"negative","values":[1]}]}],"method":["Tracked documentation inventory and governed-claim counts are preserved as a timestamped historical snapshot.","The model-fracture aggregate recorded at that boundary supplies exact-anchor, protected-trace, alignment-readiness, and next-gate states.","The complete current public claim tier is published separately at /claims/ and /claims/catalog.json.","Repository scale, artifact volume, and control maturity are not treated as substitutes for model-quality evidence."],"boundaries":["Repository-scale counts describe governed engineering inventory, not model quality or production readiness.","The internal registry contains 44 governed claims; the public matrix is a curated 9-claim release subset.","Exact parity is limited to five frozen engineering cases at complete K32 reconstruction.","The protected four-way trace is complete and sparse-alignment execution is available, but no complete aligned checkpoint is evidenced here.","Material K8, K16, K24, and adaptive-K quality, latency, throughput, memory, and energy remain unevaluated on the converted model.","No dense-superiority, production-readiness, cross-model portability, continual-learning, or capability-marketplace claim is supported by this snapshot."]},{"id":"review-readiness","title":"Review readiness","route":"/erais/proof/review-readiness/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/review_readiness/review_readiness_summary.json","category":"Engineering controls","evidence_class":"control","posture":"reviewed","currency":"stale","currency_reason":"The review packet predates later registry repairs, phase failures, and evidence families.","next_evidence":"Rebuild the review packet and release checklist from the next approved evidence release.","decision_relevance":["diligence","governance"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-06T00:28:45.112952Z","finding":"Review controls are visible and machine-auditable, including unresolved and held items.","caveat":"A review-ready evidence pack is not equivalent to approval for public production inference.","related":["diligence-readiness","state-of-play"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/review_readiness/review_readiness_summary.json"},{"label":"Release checklist posture values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/review-readiness/release-checklist.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"artifact-coverage","label":"Required artifacts present","display":"18/18","context":"Controlled review inventory.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.present_artifact_count + headline.required_artifact_count"},{"id":"release-checks","label":"Release checks passing","display":"12","context":"The public release still requires human approval.","source_field":"headline.release_checklist_pass"},{"id":"risks","label":"Active risks","display":"4","context":"Risks are retained rather than suppressed.","tone":"warning","source_field":"headline.risk_count"},{"id":"distribution","label":"External distribution","display":"Held","context":"Current controlled-release decision.","tone":"blocked","source_field":"headline.external_distribution_ready"}],"charts":[{"id":"release-checklist","kind":"progress","title":"Release checklist posture","description":"Passing and non-passing items in the approved release checklist.","finding":"The checklist items pass, but distribution remains separately human-gated.","unit":"checks","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/review-readiness/release-checklist.csv","source_fields":["headline.release_checklist_pass","headline.release_checklist_non_pass","headline.release_checklist_blocked"],"series":[{"label":"Count","color":"#53636a","tone":"neutral"}],"rows":[{"label":"Pass","tone":"positive","values":[12]},{"label":"Non-pass","tone":"warning","values":[0]},{"label":"Blocked","tone":"negative","values":[0]}]}],"method":["Artifact presence, release checklist, risk register, redaction, security, and distribution decisions are reviewed as separate controls.","A complete inventory does not bypass required human or disclosure approval."],"boundaries":["This pack is an index for approved public proof material, not a public source release.","No dense-baseline superiority, production-readiness or unrestricted reproducibility claim.","No raw data, prompts, weights, checkpoints, private traces, source code, source internals or raw evidence identifiers are bundled.","Sensitive implementation details remain withheld; public evidence is limited to sanitized summaries, method posture and registered caveats.","Public release still requires explicit human approval.","A controlled investor evidence-set approval exists for controlled diligence only; broader public release remains excluded."]},{"id":"quality-gates","title":"Quality gates","route":"/erais/proof/quality-gates/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/quality_gates/quality_gates_summary.json","category":"Engineering controls","evidence_class":"control","posture":"reviewed","currency":"superseded","currency_reason":"The recorded 41/41 phase pass is superseded by a newer sanitized authority: canonical registry integrity is 41/41, while raw phase discovery remains 38 pass / 3 fail.","next_evidence":"Rerun and close—or retain—the three failing raw-discovery validations, then publish an exact-SHA quality-gate pack with executed assembly CI.","decision_relevance":["governance","diligence"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-06T00:28:45.117519Z","finding":"Critical system surfaces are governed by explicit pass/fail controls rather than narrative assurance alone.","caveat":"Control coverage describes engineering discipline; it does not independently prove model capability.","related":["review-readiness","diligence-readiness"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/quality_gates/quality_gates_summary.json"},{"label":"Historical control coverage (6 July) values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/quality-gates/gate-coverage.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"critical-gates","label":"Historical critical gates","display":"21","context":"Recorded by the 6 July pack; not a current-stack pass statement.","tone":"warning","source_field":"headline.critical_gate_count"},{"id":"phase-registry","label":"Historical phase passes","display":"41","context":"Superseded by a newer authority reporting 38 pass and 3 fail.","tone":"blocked","source_field":"headline.phase_registry_pass_count"},{"id":"observability","label":"Historical observability passes","display":"5","context":"Recorded aggregate control status at the historical source boundary.","source_field":"headline.observability_signal_pass_count"},{"id":"api-issues","label":"Historical API issues","display":"0","context":"Recorded API-surface result; current status requires a new approved release.","tone":"warning","source_field":"headline.api_issue_count"}],"charts":[{"id":"gate-coverage","kind":"status","title":"Historical control coverage (6 July)","description":"Passing and missing/failed counts as recorded by the superseded 6 July pack across three governed control families.","finding":"This chart preserves the earlier record for traceability. It is superseded by a newer phase authority reporting 38 pass and 3 fail.","unit":"controls","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/quality-gates/gate-coverage.csv","source_fields":["headline.critical_gate_count + headline.critical_missing_count","headline.phase_registry_pass_count + headline.phase_registry_missing_requirement_count","headline.observability_signal_pass_count + headline.observability_signal_fail_count"],"series":[{"label":"Passing","color":"#00845f","tone":"positive"},{"label":"Missing / failed","color":"#c33c54","tone":"negative"}],"rows":[{"label":"Critical gates","values":[21,0]},{"label":"Phase registry","values":[41,0]},{"label":"Observability","values":[5,0]}]}],"method":["This visualization is retained as a historical record and must not be presented as the current phase posture.","Configuration, API surface, phase registry, observability, and critical release controls are audited independently.","Control coverage supports an engineering-discipline claim, not a model-quality claim."],"boundaries":["Aggregate public-safe quality-gate metrics only.","No source code, script paths, test paths, command names, config payloads, CPU flags, private traces, model weights, checkpoints, raw prompts, or raw datasets are bundled.","No model-quality, dense-superiority, uptime, service-level, production-readiness, or external benchmark reproduction claim.","Phase-audit and discovery-validation status are separate; this surface reports public-safe aggregate gate posture.","The current authority records 38 passing phases and 3 failures; this pack's 41/41 posture is superseded."]},{"id":"evidence-curves","title":"Evidence curves","route":"/erais/proof/evidence-curves/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/evidence_curves/curves_summary.json","category":"Measured evidence","evidence_class":"measured","posture":"reviewed","currency":"historical","currency_reason":"The measurements remain bounded historical feasibility evidence and are not current-stack performance evidence.","next_evidence":"Repeat under a frozen current stack with matched controls before any broader comparison or performance use.","decision_relevance":["research","diligence"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-06T00:28:45.093594Z","finding":"The approved runs expose measurable resource behavior with source rows and bounded interpretation.","caveat":"These curves do not establish dense-baseline superiority or production performance.","related":["training-probe","scale-matrix-100m"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/evidence_curves/curves_summary.json"},{"label":"Peak resident memory by scale values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/evidence-curves/peak-rss-by-scale.csv"},{"label":"Peak RSS reduction by scale values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/evidence-curves/rss-reduction-by-scale.csv"},{"label":"Memory saving by stored parameter scale values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/evidence-curves/memory-saving-scatter.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"max-reduction","label":"Largest one-step RSS reduction","display":"47.9%","context":"Observed at 1000M; local one-step feasibility run.","source_field":"headline.max_memory_reduction_pct"},{"id":"max-saving","label":"Largest one-step RSS saving","display":"9,073 MiB","context":"Difference between compared local peak-RSS measurements.","source_field":"headline.max_memory_saving_mib"},{"id":"ten-step-reduction","label":"Largest ten-step RSS reduction","display":"50.1%","context":"Observed at 1000M; local ten-step feasibility run.","source_field":"headline.ten_step_max_memory_reduction_pct"},{"id":"loss-signal","label":"500M notebook eval-loss drop","display":"32.0%","context":"Separate approved notebook signal; not a dense-superiority result.","source_field":"headline.notebook_500m_eval_loss_drop_pct"}],"charts":[{"id":"peak-rss-by-scale","kind":"line","title":"Peak resident memory by scale","description":"ERAIS and dense-control peak RSS in approved local one-step feasibility runs.","finding":"The measured RSS gap increases across the four approved scale points, subject to the local-run boundary.","unit":"MiB","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/evidence-curves/peak-rss-by-scale.csv","source_fields":["scale_memory_rows[*].erais_peak_rss_mib","scale_memory_rows[*].dense_peak_rss_mib"],"series":[{"label":"ERAIS","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"},{"label":"Dense control","color":"#d55e00","tone":"secondary"}],"rows":[{"label":"50M","values":[2688.195,3580.406]},{"label":"100M","values":[3079.66,4520.012]},{"label":"500M","values":[6894.461,11280.352]},{"label":"1000M","values":[9870.09,18942.91]}]},{"id":"rss-reduction-by-scale","kind":"line","title":"Peak RSS reduction by scale","description":"Calculated percentage difference from the paired local peak-RSS values.","finding":"The bounded runs report reductions from 24.9% at 50M to 47.9% at 1000M.","unit":"%","precision":1,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/evidence-curves/rss-reduction-by-scale.csv","source_fields":["scale_memory_rows[*].erais_memory_reduction_pct"],"series":[{"label":"Reduction","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"50M","values":[24.919]},{"label":"100M","values":[31.866]},{"label":"500M","values":[38.881]},{"label":"1000M","values":[47.896]}]},{"id":"memory-saving-scatter","kind":"scatter","title":"Memory saving by stored parameter scale","description":"Published parameter scale against the paired local peak-RSS saving for each approved one-step run.","finding":"The four published observations show larger absolute RSS savings at larger stored-parameter labels; this remains bounded local evidence.","unit":"paired observations","x_unit":"M parameters","y_unit":"MiB saved","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/evidence-curves/memory-saving-scatter.csv","source_fields":["scale_memory_rows[*].params_m","scale_memory_rows[*].erais_memory_saving_mib"],"series":[{"label":"Stored parameters","color":"#d55e00","tone":"secondary"},{"label":"Peak RSS saving","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"50M","values":[50,892.211]},{"label":"100M","values":[100,1440.352]},{"label":"500M","values":[500,4385.891]},{"label":"1000M","values":[1000,9072.82]}]}],"method":["The comparison uses paired local feasibility runs at 50M, 100M, 500M, and 1000M labels.","Peak resident memory and smoke-loss values are published together so the resource result is not separated from its guardrail signal."],"boundaries":["Local evidence only.","10-step desktop scale rows are feasibility/resource-shape evidence.","No final quality superiority claim.","No matched dense throughput superiority claim.","No external reproduction claim."]},{"id":"sparse-plan-counting","title":"Exact sparse-plan construction","route":"/erais/proof/sparse-plan-counting/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/sparse_plan_counting/sparse_plan_counting_summary.json","category":"Measured evidence","evidence_class":"measured","posture":"bounded","currency":"historical","currency_reason":"The exact component result remains valid at its source boundary, but it is not a current end-to-end result.","next_evidence":"Integrate the component into a matched quality-bearing end-to-end evaluation before expanding its performance meaning.","decision_relevance":["research","engineering"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"source_identity":{"commit":"e00a3bb095e33e352e5b3da2e681270b656c565b"},"generated_at":"2026-07-16T02:06:07Z","finding":"Across 20 measurements per arm, direct block-region counting retained the tested plan identity and reduced mean 65,536-token plan-construction time from 784.49 ms to 7.99 ms on the disclosed host.","caveat":"This is component-level engineering evidence. It does not establish end-to-end speed, model quality, memory or energy savings, cross-host performance, or superiority.","related":["model-fracture","quality-gates"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/sparse_plan_counting/sparse_plan_counting_summary.json"},{"label":"Mean sparse-plan construction time values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/sparse-plan-counting/plan-construction-time.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"baseline-time","label":"Baseline mean","display":"784.49 ms","context":"Token-pair enumeration for one complete 65,536-token plan construction.","source_field":"headline.baseline_mean_ms"},{"id":"candidate-time","label":"Candidate mean","display":"7.99 ms","context":"Exact block-region counting on the same host and plan protocol.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.candidate_mean_ms"},{"id":"wall-reduction","label":"Component wall-time reduction","display":"98.98%","context":"Component-only engineering result; not end-to-end performance.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.wall_reduction_percent"},{"id":"exactness","label":"Tested plan identity","display":"Matched","context":"20 timing measurements per arm; identity checked separately.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.exact_plan_identity + exactness.hash_equal_across_arms"}],"charts":[{"id":"plan-construction-time","kind":"comparison","title":"Mean sparse-plan construction time","description":"Host-local time to construct one complete 65,536-token sparse-attention plan before and after exact block-region counting.","finding":"The candidate retained the tested plan identity while reducing this component's mean wall time from 784.49 ms to 7.99 ms.","unit":"ms","precision":2,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/sparse-plan-counting/plan-construction-time.csv","source_fields":["headline.baseline_mean_ms","headline.candidate_mean_ms"],"series":[{"label":"Mean wall time","color":"#0072b2","tone":"neutral"}],"rows":[{"label":"Token-pair enumeration","tone":"warning","values":[784.4874168862589]},{"label":"Block-region counting","tone":"positive","values":[7.985546183772386]}]}],"method":["The measured component is sparse-attention plan construction, not attention execution, training, or generation.","Twenty complete plan constructions were measured per arm on the same disclosed CPU host at a sequence length of 65,536 tokens.","The baseline enumerated causal token pairs; the candidate counted the same selected block regions directly.","Plan hashes, pair counts, partial-final-block cases, and focused regression tests were used to check identity."],"boundaries":["End-to-end training or generation speedup","Model quality or generalisation","Memory or energy savings","Cross-host performance","A public superiority claim"]},{"id":"extreme-context-decoding","title":"Extreme-context decode ladder","route":"/erais/proof/extreme-context-decoding/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/extreme_context_decoding/extreme_context_decoding_summary.json","category":"Measured evidence","evidence_class":"measured","posture":"bounded","currency":"historical","currency_reason":"The 524K/20-repetition ladder remains valid at its synthetic current-host boundary. A separate sanitized 2M/50-repetition derivative is now published in the held terminal handoff.","next_evidence":"Clear final assembly CI, then advance from synthetic all-zero K/V to representative histories and quality-bearing workloads.","decision_relevance":["research","investment"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"source_identity":{"commit":"35cd16d08e78a531a3803dca9680381aedcde392","tree":"2a2b7865b94c6b86627ffacef921898b61995074"},"generated_at":"2026-07-16T03:15:32Z","finding":"Tiny and Small completed the declared ladder through 524,288 tokens, while Medium completed every safely admitted point through 131,072; 4,991 metric rows closed with zero observatory errors.","caveat":"The history is synthetic all-zero K/V. These results do not establish language quality, generalisation, energy, whole-process memory, cross-host performance, end-to-end throughput, or superiority.","related":["sparse-plan-counting","resource-outlook"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/extreme_context_decoding/extreme_context_decoding_summary.json"},{"label":"Safely admitted context ceiling by candidate scale values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/extreme-context-decoding/admitted-context-ceiling.csv"},{"label":"Recorded cache tensor-representation ratio values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/extreme-context-decoding/cache-representation-ratio.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"max-context","label":"Largest admitted context","display":"524,288 tokens","context":"Reached by the Tiny and Small synthetic candidates; Medium stopped at its declared admission boundary.","source_field":"headline.max_context_tokens"},{"id":"candidate-scales","label":"Replicated candidate scales","display":"3","context":"20 decode trials per context and mode; synthetic CPU-only protocol.","source_field":"headline.candidate_count + headline.decode_replicates_per_context_mode"},{"id":"evidence-rows","label":"Ordered metric rows","display":"4,991","context":"87,451 scalar values; 0 observatory errors.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.metric_row_count + headline.scalar_value_count + headline.observatory_error_count"},{"id":"fixed-shortlist-result","label":"Tiny shortlist exact contexts","display":"0/11","context":"Retained negative result: the faster fixed 16-token shortlist did not preserve exact sequences.","tone":"blocked","source_field":"headline.fixed_shortlist_exact_context_count + headline.fixed_shortlist_tested_context_count"}],"charts":[{"id":"admitted-context-ceiling","kind":"bar","title":"Safely admitted context ceiling by candidate scale","description":"Largest completed power-of-two context under the declared current-host memory admission policy.","finding":"Tiny and Small completed through 524,288 tokens; Medium completed through 131,072 and refused the two larger points before allocation.","unit":"tokens","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/extreme-context-decoding/admitted-context-ceiling.csv","source_fields":["scale_rows[*].max_context_tokens"],"series":[{"label":"Maximum completed context","color":"#0072b2","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"Tiny","values":[524288]},{"label":"Small","values":[524288]},{"label":"Medium","tone":"warning","values":[131072]}]},{"id":"cache-representation-ratio","kind":"bar","title":"Recorded cache tensor-representation ratio","description":"Sequence-cache tensor storage divided by prepared recurrent-representation storage at each scale's largest completed context.","finding":"The recorded tensor-only ratio is about 15,887.5× for Tiny and Small and 1,985.9× for Medium at their respective admitted ceilings.","unit":"×","precision":1,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/extreme-context-decoding/cache-representation-ratio.csv","source_fields":["scale_rows[*].sequence_cache_tensor_mib","scale_rows[*].prepared_recurrent_representation_mib"],"series":[{"label":"Tensor representation ratio","color":"#9b4f96","tone":"secondary"}],"rows":[{"label":"Tiny","values":[15887.515151515152]},{"label":"Small","values":[15887.515151515152]},{"label":"Medium","values":[1985.939393939394]}]}],"method":["Three CPU-only candidate scales were measured on one disclosed host using a synthetic all-zero K/V history.","Tiny and Small covered powers of two from 512 through 524,288 tokens; Medium covered each safely admitted point through 131,072 tokens.","Each context and decode mode used 20 decode trials; each context and cache profile used 10 transition trials, with 10,000 bootstrap resamples for mean confidence intervals.","The Medium 262,144- and 524,288-token points were not attempted because the declared allocation increment, physical-memory floor, and headroom exceeded the observed admission envelope.","Turbo and fixed-shortlist paths are retained as semantic-change and negative evidence; neither is treated as an equivalent-generation performance result."],"boundaries":["Language quality or generalisation","Energy savings","Cross-host performance","End-to-end training or generation throughput","Whole-process memory savings","Commercial or architectural superiority"]},{"id":"model-fracture","title":"Model fracture milestone","route":"/erais/proof/model-fracture/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/model_fracture/model_fracture_summary.json","category":"Measured evidence","evidence_class":"measured","posture":"bounded","currency":"historical","currency_reason":"The exact complete-expert anchor remains bounded historical evidence. Sanitized route-ceiling and oracle-ladder negative diagnostics are now published separately in the held terminal handoff.","next_evidence":"Use the retained negative geometry to test refracture and recovery, then rerun the material-sparsity ladder under quality-bearing controls.","decision_relevance":["research","investment","diligence"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-12T09:16:00Z","finding":"All 28 donor layers produced balanced expert assignments, K32 matched five frozen engineering cases exactly, and all 112 protected trace units completed across four isolated roles.","caveat":"The bounded alignment path is executable, but no complete aligned checkpoint is promoted; K8/K16/K24 quality, savings, broader generalisation, and production readiness remain unevaluated.","related":["training-probe","quality-gates"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/model_fracture/model_fracture_summary.json"},{"label":"Exact reconstruction checks values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/model-fracture/exact-reconstruction.csv"},{"label":"Assignment structure across 28 donor layers values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/model-fracture/assignment-divergence.csv"},{"label":"Native adapter update scope values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/model-fracture/adapter-scope.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"layers","label":"Donor layers traced","display":"28/28","context":"32 balanced experts per layer; 96 neurons each.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.traced_layers + headline.required_layers"},{"id":"exact-cases","label":"Exact frozen cases","display":"5/5","context":"First logits, first-token top-five order, and complete greedy generations at K32.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.exact_generation_cases + headline.engineering_case_count"},{"id":"first-logit-error","label":"Maximum first-logit error","display":"0.0","context":"Observed across the five registered engineering cases; broader token-level comparison remains a next gate.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.maximum_first_logit_error"},{"id":"fresh-trace","label":"Protected trace units","display":"112/112","context":"4 isolated roles across all 28 layers; no failed or interrupted unit was promoted.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.fresh_trace_unit_count + headline.fresh_trace_required_unit_count + headline.fresh_trace_role_count"}],"charts":[{"id":"exact-reconstruction","kind":"status","title":"Exact reconstruction checks","description":"Matched and compared case counts for the three frozen K32 engineering-parity checks.","finding":"All three checks matched in all five cases; this is exact observed reconstruction within the frozen set, not broad quality evidence.","unit":"cases","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/model-fracture/exact-reconstruction.csv","source_fields":["parity_rows[*].matched_cases","parity_rows[*].compared_cases"],"series":[{"label":"Matched","color":"#00845f","tone":"positive"},{"label":"Compared","color":"#53636a","tone":"neutral"}],"rows":[{"label":"First-token logits","values":[5,5]},{"label":"First-token top five","values":[5,5]},{"label":"Greedy generations","values":[5,5]}]},{"id":"assignment-divergence","kind":"line","title":"Assignment structure across 28 donor layers","description":"Minimum, median, and maximum difference between balanced activation-derived assignments and contiguous neuron slices.","finding":"Every layer produced a distinct balanced assignment 96.5–97.6% different from contiguous slicing; this establishes non-arbitrary organisation, not semantic superiority.","unit":"% different","precision":1,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/model-fracture/assignment-divergence.csv","source_fields":["assignment_summary_rows[*].assignment_difference_pct"],"series":[{"label":"Assignment difference","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"Minimum observed","values":[96.549]},{"label":"Median observed","values":[96.94]},{"label":"Maximum observed","values":[97.559]}]},{"id":"adapter-scope","kind":"progress","title":"Native adapter update scope","description":"Trainable and frozen parameter shares in the 671.315M-parameter one-step bootstrap.","finding":"The update covered 577 injected modules while training 1.552% of parameters; it proves local numerical execution, not convergence or generation quality.","unit":"% of parameters","precision":3,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/model-fracture/adapter-scope.csv","source_fields":["adapter_scope_rows[*].parameter_share_pct"],"series":[{"label":"Parameter share","color":"#9b4f96","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"Trainable adapter","tone":"positive","values":[1.552]},{"label":"Frozen parameters","tone":"neutral","values":[98.448]}]}],"method":["A frozen real-model activation trace covered all 28 feed-forward layers and assigned every source neuron exactly once into equal-width experts.","The complete K32 expert set was reconstructed and compared with the donor on five pre-registered engineering cases; a separate native checkpoint then completed one bounded adapter step.","A separate protected trace completed all 112 layer-role units across train, calibration, validation, and final-holdout roles, with distinct split identities and no fit access to the final holdout.","The bounded alignment execution path is implemented and its protocol is executable; this pack does not present a complete real aligned checkpoint or terminal alignment receipt.","The machine-readable source JSON retains all 28 layer rows; the visual chart presents their minimum, median, and maximum for legibility."],"boundaries":["Exact parity is limited to five frozen engineering cases at complete K32 reconstruction.","The activation curriculum was a small synthetic engineering set and does not establish semantic or routing superiority.","The adapter result is one finite update, not convergence, benchmark quality, or sustained training evidence.","The protected four-way trace is complete and the bounded alignment path is executable, but no complete real 28-layer aligned checkpoint or terminal alignment receipt is promoted here.","K8, K16, K24, and adaptive-K quality, latency, throughput, memory, and energy remain unevaluated on this converted model.","No production-readiness, cross-model portability, continual-learning, or capability-marketplace claim is supported by this pack."]},{"id":"terminal-evidence-handoff","title":"Terminal evidence handoff","route":"/erais/proof/terminal-evidence-handoff/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/terminal_handoff/manifest.json","category":"Engineering controls","evidence_class":"control","posture":"bounded","currency":"held","currency_reason":"Five public-eligible derivatives are pinned, hash-verified, and backed by successful source-family CI. Final assembly CI did not execute because of an external GitHub billing limit, so the package remains held from current-claim promotion.","next_evidence":"Restore CI availability and execute the exact final package commit, while retaining the three raw phase-discovery failures and all negative scientific results unless they genuinely close.","decision_relevance":["research","investment","diligence","governance"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"source_identity":{"commit":"77f9cb2622c25c2e92f5075118db02c3de29f8d0","tree":"f1a69a4121cedf774f9738ff8b2f7541fd630c43"},"generated_at":"2026-07-28T04:04:23Z","finding":"The package records 38/41 raw phase discovery, 44 reconciled claim rows, a guarded 2,048K synthetic CPU candidate, and two component-geometry failures that narrow the next refracture and recovery experiments.","caveat":"Source-family CI passed, but final assembly CI did not start because of an external billing limit. The package does not promote language quality, sparse serving, end-to-end performance, production readiness, or commercial superiority.","related":["model-fracture","extreme-context-decoding","quality-gates"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/terminal_handoff/manifest.json"},{"label":"Registry integrity and raw discovery are separate values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/terminal-evidence-handoff/phase-authority.csv"},{"label":"2,048K synthetic decode throughput values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/terminal-evidence-handoff/context-throughput.csv"},{"label":"Unrecovered component approximation error values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/terminal-evidence-handoff/route-ceiling-error.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"bundle-integrity","label":"Sanitized package integrity","display":"Hash verified","context":"Exact signed Git object, strict file allowlist, outer hashes, canonical self-manifests, and disclosure scan.","tone":"warning","source_field":"manifest.bundle_integrity_status + source_provenance.integrity"},{"id":"raw-phase-discovery","label":"Raw phase discovery","display":"38/41","context":"Three failures remain. The separate 41/41 result checks canonical registry and declared-artifact integrity only.","tone":"blocked","source_field":"phase_registry_quality.raw_discovery_diagnostic"},{"id":"claim-reconciliation","label":"Claims / evidence links","display":"44 / 99","context":"49 unique hash-registered paths with 0 reconciliation issues; this does not prove the claims.","source_field":"claims_evidence_matrix.counts.claim_rows + counts.claim_evidence_links + counts.unique_claim_evidence_paths + counts.issues"},{"id":"guarded-context","label":"Largest completed context","display":"2,097,152 tokens","context":"50 replicates per mode on the Tiny CPU synthetic all-zero K/V candidate; 4,096K was refused before allocation.","source_field":"extreme_context_2048k.protocol.completed_context_max + protocol.decode_replicates_per_context_mode + resource_guard_boundary.first_rejected_context"},{"id":"turbo-sequence-agreement","label":"Turbo sequence agreement","display":"82%","context":"At 2,048K. The semantic-changing turbo path is retained as a diagnostic and is not promoted.","tone":"blocked","source_field":"extreme_context_2048k.context_2048k.full_vocab_turbo_sequence_match.mean"},{"id":"fine-first-passing-width","label":"Fine geometry first pass","display":"2,880 / 3,072","context":"Unrecovered donor-derived component geometry; both registered geometries failed at equal active width 1,152.","tone":"warning","source_field":"qwen_oracle_ladder_negative.calibration.first_passing_active_width.fine_geometry"}],"charts":[{"id":"phase-authority","kind":"status","title":"Registry integrity and raw discovery are separate","description":"The sanitized phase derivative retains both views rather than converting canonical integrity into an all-pass experimental claim.","finding":"Canonical registry integrity is 41/41, while raw discovery remains 38 pass and three fail.","unit":"phases","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/terminal-evidence-handoff/phase-authority.csv","source_fields":["phase_registry_quality.canonical_registry_integrity.pass + canonical_registry_integrity.fail","phase_registry_quality.raw_discovery_diagnostic.pass + raw_discovery_diagnostic.fail"],"series":[{"label":"Pass","color":"#00845f","tone":"positive"},{"label":"Fail","color":"#c33c54","tone":"negative"}],"rows":[{"label":"Canonical registry integrity","values":[41,0]},{"label":"Raw discovery","values":[38,3]}]},{"id":"context-throughput","kind":"comparison","title":"2,048K synthetic decode throughput","description":"Mean current-host CPU decode throughput across 50 replicates per mode for one 2.473M-parameter Tiny candidate.","finding":"The semantic-changing turbo mode measured faster, but exact sequence agreement was only 82% and first-step logits were not bitwise equal.","unit":"tok/s","precision":1,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/terminal-evidence-handoff/context-throughput.csv","source_fields":["extreme_context_2048k.context_2048k.full_vocab_decode_tps.mean","extreme_context_2048k.context_2048k.full_vocab_turbo_decode_tps.mean"],"series":[{"label":"Full vocabulary","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"},{"label":"Turbo (not promoted)","color":"#d55e00","tone":"warning"}],"rows":[{"label":"2,048K context","values":[357.84639610544053,441.8502543713573]}]},{"id":"route-ceiling-error","kind":"comparison","title":"Unrecovered component approximation error","description":"Calibration mean and p95 per-row relative FFN-output L2-squared error against the frozen 0.02 mean / 0.05 p95 gate.","finding":"Learned and oracle K8 remained above the gate; record-shared oracle K16 improved the result but still failed. Geometry error dominated router error.","unit":"relative L2²","precision":3,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/terminal-evidence-handoff/route-ceiling-error.csv","source_fields":["qwen_route_ceiling_negative.calibration.*.mean_relative_l2_squared + gate.mean_max","qwen_route_ceiling_negative.calibration.*.p95_relative_l2_squared + gate.p95_max"],"series":[{"label":"Mean","color":"#c33c54","tone":"negative"},{"label":"P95","color":"#8a6500","tone":"warning"}],"rows":[{"label":"Learned K8","values":[0.24558701416748155,0.4585041806101796]},{"label":"Oracle K8","values":[0.21865814735940667,0.39265907704830166]},{"label":"Shared oracle K16","values":[0.14515724479007194,0.2703385561704635]},{"label":"Frozen maximum","tone":"positive","values":[0.02,0.05]}]}],"method":["The importer reads only eight allowlisted blobs from the exact signed ERAIS commit and tree; it does not read the ERAIS working tree.","Outer file hashes, the package hash list, six canonical JSON self-manifests, contracts, source identities, and a disclosure scan are verified before an atomic site-side promotion.","Successful CI receipts remain attached to the three source evidence families. The final publication commit is explicitly not labelled CI-verified because its jobs did not start under an external billing limit.","Canonical phase-registry integrity and raw phase discovery remain separate signals. Negative component results are preserved as decision evidence, not hidden or softened.","Only aggregate public derivatives are staged. Raw rows, prompts, token identifiers, weights, protected identities, and moving experiments remain outside the public site."],"boundaries":["The final assembly commit is not CI-verified; successful source-family CI does not silently transfer to the package assembly.","The 2,048K result uses synthetic all-zero K/V on one CPU host and a 2.473M-parameter Tiny candidate. It does not establish language quality, generalisation, production context support, cross-host speed, whole-process memory, energy, training throughput, or commercial superiority.","Turbo changed semantics: 82% exact sequence agreement and non-bitwise-equal first-step logits prohibit equivalence wording.","The route-ceiling and oracle-ladder results are unrecovered donor-derived component diagnostics, not language rollouts. They do not establish recovery impossibility, router readiness, serving performance, or production readiness.","Claim-to-evidence hash reconciliation establishes registry consistency, not claim truth or promotion authority.","Canonical 41/41 registry integrity does not mean all experiments were rerun and does not erase the three retained raw-discovery failures."]},{"id":"training-probe","title":"Training probe","route":"/erais/proof/training-probe/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/training_probe/training_probe_summary.json","category":"Measured evidence","evidence_class":"measured","posture":"reviewed","currency":"stale","currency_reason":"The public provenance predates a repaired artifact digest and current phase-41 contract discovery.","next_evidence":"Regenerate from the repaired exact artifact identity and close or retain the phase-41 contract-discovery failure.","decision_relevance":["research","engineering"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-06T00:28:45.122427Z","finding":"Small controlled probes provide measurement signals suitable for engineering decisions and follow-up experiments.","caveat":"Probe-scale behavior is not a substitute for matched end-to-end production benchmarks.","related":["evidence-curves","continued-training"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/training_probe/training_probe_summary.json"},{"label":"Probe throughput by sequence length values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/training-probe/throughput-by-sequence.csv"},{"label":"Pair-work reduction by sequence length values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/training-probe/pair-work-by-sequence.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"median-tps","label":"Overall median throughput","display":"388.6 tok/s","context":"Across the approved bounded probe rows.","source_field":"headline.median_tps"},{"id":"min-tps","label":"Minimum observed throughput","display":"304.6 tok/s","context":"Minimum in the approved probe set.","source_field":"headline.min_tps"},{"id":"pair-work","label":"Median pair-work reduction","display":"1.58×","context":"Within the bounded probe configuration.","source_field":"headline.median_pair_work_reduction_x"},{"id":"trainable-share","label":"Trainable parameter share","display":"24.1%","context":"125M of 520M parameters.","source_field":"headline.trainable_ratio_pct + headline.trainable_params_m + headline.total_params_m"}],"charts":[{"id":"throughput-by-sequence","kind":"line","title":"Probe throughput by sequence length","description":"Minimum and median tokens per second across the approved sequence-length groups.","finding":"The 1024-token probe group reports higher minimum and median throughput than the 512-token group in this bounded run set.","unit":"tokens/s","precision":1,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/training-probe/throughput-by-sequence.csv","source_fields":["sequence_rows[*].min_tps","sequence_rows[*].median_tps"],"series":[{"label":"Minimum","color":"#d55e00","tone":"secondary"},{"label":"Median","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"512 tokens","values":[304.558,340.06]},{"label":"1024 tokens","values":[417.007,448.041]}]},{"id":"pair-work-by-sequence","kind":"line","title":"Pair-work reduction by sequence length","description":"Median within-probe pair-work reduction for each approved sequence length.","finding":"The reported reduction is larger in the 1024-token probe group, within the current two-point scope.","unit":"×","precision":2,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/training-probe/pair-work-by-sequence.csv","source_fields":["sequence_rows[*].median_pair_work_reduction_x"],"series":[{"label":"Median reduction","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"512 tokens","values":[1.279]},{"label":"1024 tokens","values":[1.881]}]}],"method":["The public summary groups 30 finite-loss optimizer-step rows across two sequence lengths.","Probe throughput is an engineering signal and must not be generalized to production serving throughput."],"boundaries":["Local bounded training-throughput and trainability probe only.","Parameter counts are normalized to M.","No step-level rows, raw losses, config payloads, probe args, layer names, parameter names, block plans, memory snapshots, source paths, command names, script names, source internals, model weights, checkpoints, raw prompts, or raw datasets are bundled.","No dense-baseline superiority, downstream quality, production-readiness, external benchmark reproduction, long-run training stability, or service-level claim.","Pair-work reduction is an aggregate local probe signal, not an end-user capability or quality claim."]},{"id":"continued-training","title":"Continued training","route":"/erais/proof/continued-training/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/continued_training/continued_training_summary.json","category":"Measured evidence","evidence_class":"measured","posture":"partial","currency":"historical","currency_reason":"This is a historical run record, not evidence for the current trainer, tokenizer, optimizer, or model state.","next_evidence":"Run and seal a current exact-resume continuation with frozen evaluation and generation review.","decision_relevance":["research"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-06T00:28:45.124460Z","finding":"The training continuation path is instrumented and produces governed stability evidence.","caveat":"Generation quality and broad model capability remain under review and are not mature public claims.","related":["training-probe","full-stack-training"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/continued_training/continued_training_summary.json"},{"label":"Generation gate results values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/continued-training/generation-gate-results.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"tokens-seen","label":"Valid target tokens seen","display":"10.437M","context":"Approved continued-training run scale.","source_field":"headline.valid_target_tokens_m"},{"id":"eval-loss-reduction","label":"Eval-loss reduction","display":"6.4%","context":"First-to-last public aggregate evaluation signal.","source_field":"headline.eval_loss_reduction_pct"},{"id":"reload-checks","label":"Checkpoint reload checks","display":"5","context":"All published reload checks passed.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.checkpoint_reload_check_pass_count"},{"id":"generation-gate","label":"Generation gate","display":"FAIL","context":"6 hard failures across the approved prompts.","tone":"blocked","source_field":"headline.generation_gate_status + headline.generation_hard_failure_count"}],"charts":[{"id":"generation-gate-results","kind":"status","title":"Generation gate results","description":"Passed and hard-failure counts in the current public generation gate.","finding":"The current generation gate fails; no prompt in the published set passed. That held result remains visible.","unit":"prompts","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/continued-training/generation-gate-results.csv","source_fields":["headline.generation_passed_count","headline.generation_hard_failure_count"],"series":[{"label":"Count","color":"#53636a","tone":"neutral"}],"rows":[{"label":"Passed","tone":"positive","values":[0]},{"label":"Hard failures","tone":"negative","values":[6]}]}],"method":["Training, post-training evaluation, checkpoint reload, and generation approval are evaluated as distinct controls.","Improved loss signals do not override a failed generation-quality gate."],"boundaries":["Aggregate sealed-continuation metrics only.","Parameter and token units are normalized; token counts are shown in M where charted.","No checkpoint paths, checkpoint hashes, tokenizer hashes, command arguments, source paths, dirty status, raw eval rows, raw sample outputs, prompts, generations, token IDs, logits, private traces, model weights, checkpoints, source internals, or mechanism details are bundled.","Generation gate is intentionally published as failed/held, so public capability and production claims remain blocked.","No dense-baseline superiority, downstream quality, production-readiness, unrestricted reproducibility, source-release, or proven-breakthrough claim."]},{"id":"full-stack-training","title":"Full-stack training","route":"/erais/proof/full-stack-training/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/full_stack_training/full_stack_training_summary.json","category":"Measured evidence","evidence_class":"measured","posture":"partial","currency":"held","currency_reason":"The existing importer can ambiguously match multiple metrics streams and cannot establish one exact current run identity.","next_evidence":"Select one exact run and bind its metrics, receipts, model, data, configuration, and review before refresh.","decision_relevance":["research","diligence"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-06T10:17:19.863464Z","finding":"The integrated training path runs with observable safety and quality signals.","caveat":"Current evidence does not approve commercial product readiness or unrestricted generation claims.","related":["continued-training","diligence-readiness"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/full_stack_training/full_stack_training_summary.json"},{"label":"Training throughput signals values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/full-stack-training/throughput-signals.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"loss-reduction","label":"Observed train-loss reduction","display":"86.4%","context":"Within the published full-stack run; generation remains held.","source_field":"headline.train_loss_reduction_pct"},{"id":"mean-compute-tps","label":"Mean compute throughput","display":"59.2 tok/s","context":"Public run aggregate, not production serving throughput.","source_field":"headline.mean_compute_tps"},{"id":"pair-work","label":"Mean pair-work reduction","display":"1.88×","context":"Within the approved run geometry.","source_field":"headline.mean_pair_work_reduction_x"},{"id":"release","label":"Release decision","display":"HOLD","context":"Current evidence does not approve external distribution.","tone":"blocked","source_field":"headline.release_decision_status"}],"charts":[{"id":"throughput-signals","kind":"bar","title":"Training throughput signals","description":"Mean compute and valid-target token rates in the approved full-stack run.","finding":"The gap between compute and valid-target throughput remains visible as an operational signal.","unit":"tokens/s","precision":1,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/full-stack-training/throughput-signals.csv","source_fields":["headline.mean_compute_tps","headline.mean_valid_tps"],"series":[{"label":"Mean rate","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"Compute","values":[59.216]},{"label":"Valid target","values":[25.354]}]}],"method":["The full-stack pack combines loss, throughput, pair-work, warning, checkpoint, generation, and provenance signals.","The release decision remains held because favorable training signals do not close generation-quality and operational risks."],"boundaries":["Full-stack local integration-training aggregate evidence only.","Loss movement is a trainability and integration signal, not model-quality proof.","Throughput is published with warning status because stream irregularities were detected.","Checkpoint write pressure is published only as aggregate diagnostic evidence.","Control-plane pressure is published only as aggregate diagnostic evidence.","Eval trend claims are blocked because only one eval record is present.","Generation sample quality remains held for manual review; no mature generation-quality claim is made.","Source provenance is reduced to a clean-stamp status; private commits, paths and command details are withheld.","Parameter and token counts are normalized to M where shown.","No row-level metrics, raw paths, hashes, invocation payloads, raw prompts, raw datasets, raw outputs, model weights, or source internals are bundled.","No dense-superiority, benchmark-score, production-readiness, service-level, unrestricted reproduction, or proven-breakthrough claim is made."]},{"id":"scale-matrix-100m","title":"100M scale matrix","route":"/erais/proof/scale-matrix-100m/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/scale_matrix_100m/scale_matrix_100m_summary.json","category":"Measured evidence","evidence_class":"measured","posture":"partial","currency":"historical","currency_reason":"The bounded matrix predates the current trainer, tokenizer, optimizer, and research state.","next_evidence":"Repeat the matrix under one frozen current profile and matched control before current-stack use.","decision_relevance":["research","engineering"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-06T20:27:52Z","finding":"The scale matrix exposes a concrete engineering checkpoint with explicit dimensions and receipts.","caveat":"A single bounded scale matrix does not prove performance superiority across hardware or workloads.","related":["evidence-curves","resource-outlook"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/scale_matrix_100m/scale_matrix_100m_summary.json"},{"label":"Training peak RSS by variant values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/scale-matrix-100m/variant-rss.csv"},{"label":"Throughput ratio by variant values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/scale-matrix-100m/variant-throughput.csv"},{"label":"Active non-embedding share values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/scale-matrix-100m/variant-active-share.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"variants","label":"Passing variants","display":"5/5","context":"100 steps; sequence length 768.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.passing_variant_count + headline.variant_count"},{"id":"active-share","label":"ERAIS full active share","display":"25.4%","context":"Active share of non-embedding parameters in this variant.","source_field":"headline.erais_full_active_share_pct"},{"id":"throughput-ratio","label":"ERAIS full throughput ratio","display":"2.62×","context":"Relative to the matched dense control in this matrix.","source_field":"headline.erais_full_tps_ratio_vs_dense"},{"id":"rss-reduction","label":"ERAIS full RSS reduction","display":"31.6%","context":"Training peak RSS relative to the matched dense control.","source_field":"headline.erais_full_training_rss_reduction_pct_vs_dense"}],"charts":[{"id":"variant-rss","kind":"bar","title":"Training peak RSS by variant","description":"Peak resident memory for the five passing 100M-scale matrix variants.","finding":"ERAIS full reports the lowest peak RSS in this bounded matrix; the comparison remains tied to its disclosed geometry.","unit":"MiB","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/scale-matrix-100m/variant-rss.csv","source_fields":["rows[*].training_rss_peak_mib"],"series":[{"label":"Peak RSS","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"Dense control","values":[4873.516]},{"label":"Dense optimizer control","values":[3559.195]},{"label":"Sparse control","values":[5119.77]},{"label":"Sparse optimizer control","values":[3507.984]},{"label":"ERAIS full","values":[3331.223]}]},{"id":"variant-throughput","kind":"comparison","title":"Throughput ratio by variant","description":"Each variant's training throughput divided by the dense-control throughput in the same matrix.","finding":"ERAIS full reports 2.62× the dense-control throughput in this specific five-variant matrix.","unit":"× dense","precision":2,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/scale-matrix-100m/variant-throughput.csv","source_fields":["rows[*].throughput_ratio_vs_dense_control"],"series":[{"label":"Throughput ratio","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"Dense control","values":[1]},{"label":"Dense optimizer control","values":[1.007602]},{"label":"Sparse control","values":[0.920898]},{"label":"Sparse optimizer control","values":[0.922614]},{"label":"ERAIS full","values":[2.616137]}]},{"id":"variant-active-share","kind":"bar","title":"Active non-embedding share","description":"Minimum active share for each variant's disclosed non-embedding parameter footprint.","finding":"Only ERAIS full reports a materially reduced active share in this matrix; the other variants remain at 100%.","unit":"%","precision":1,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/scale-matrix-100m/variant-active-share.csv","source_fields":["rows[*].active_non_embedding_share_pct"],"series":[{"label":"Active share","color":"#007c86","tone":"primary"}],"rows":[{"label":"Dense control","values":[100]},{"label":"Dense optimizer control","values":[100]},{"label":"Sparse control","values":[100]},{"label":"Sparse optimizer control","values":[100]},{"label":"ERAIS full","values":[25.42]}]}],"method":["The matrix compares five variants at scale_100m, 100 steps, and sequence length 768.","Every variant reports pass status and at least 1,700 full-evaluation examples in the approved source rows."],"boundaries":["Bounded 100M local scale-matrix aggregate evidence only.","Parameter counts are normalized to M across JSON, charts and tables.","Full-eval loss movement is a local likelihood-eval signal, not a general model-quality claim.","Throughput ratio is from the local gate metric and is not a service-level or benchmark-leadership claim.","No production-readiness, mature generation-quality, dense-superiority, unrestricted reproduction or proven-breakthrough claim is made.","Raw paths, invocation details, private configuration, source commits, hashes, checkpoints, prompts, outputs, model weights and mechanism internals are not published."]},{"id":"resource-outlook","title":"Resource outlook","route":"/erais/proof/resource-outlook/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/resource_outlook/resource_outlook_summary.json","category":"Projections and diligence","evidence_class":"projection","posture":"bounded","currency":"historical","currency_reason":"These are architecture scenarios from a prior snapshot, not measured current deployment results.","next_evidence":"Refresh assumptions from the approved current architecture and keep projections separate from measured results.","decision_relevance":["investment","planning"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-06T00:28:45.119266Z","finding":"The outlook turns architecture assumptions into inspectable resource scenarios for planning.","caveat":"All values are projections, not measured deployment results, and depend on the published assumptions.","related":["scale-matrix-100m","diligence-readiness"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/resource_outlook/resource_outlook_summary.json"},{"label":"Projected active parameter share values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/resource-outlook/active-share.csv"},{"label":"Projected weight stream values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/resource-outlook/weight-stream.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"scenario-count","label":"Projection scenarios","display":"2","context":"Planning scenarios, not measured deployments.","tone":"warning","source_field":"headline.scenario_count"},{"id":"min-active-share","label":"Lowest projected active share","display":"7.2%","context":"Derived from stated architecture assumptions.","tone":"warning","source_field":"headline.min_active_share_pct"},{"id":"bandwidth-reduction","label":"Largest projected bandwidth ratio","display":"13.8×","context":"Projected active versus same-size dense weight stream.","tone":"warning","source_field":"headline.max_active_bandwidth_reduction_x"},{"id":"stored-params","label":"Largest stored-parameter scenario","display":"3,124,890M","context":"Projection envelope only.","tone":"warning","source_field":"headline.max_stored_params_m"}],"charts":[{"id":"active-share","kind":"bar","title":"Projected active parameter share","description":"Share of stored parameters projected to be active in each published scenario.","finding":"Both scenarios assume a minority active share; this remains an architecture projection, not an observed runtime result.","unit":"%","precision":1,"projection":true,"download":"/erais/proof/resource-outlook/active-share.csv","source_fields":["projection_rows[*].active_share_pct"],"series":[{"label":"Projected active share","color":"#8a6500","tone":"warning"}],"rows":[{"label":"Projection A","values":[10.034]},{"label":"Projection B","values":[7.225]}]},{"id":"weight-stream","kind":"comparison","title":"Projected weight stream","description":"Projected active weight stream compared with the same-size dense stream.","finding":"The projection estimates materially smaller active streams under its published assumptions.","unit":"GiB","precision":1,"projection":true,"download":"/erais/proof/resource-outlook/weight-stream.csv","source_fields":["projection_rows[*].active_weight_stream_gib","projection_rows[*].same_size_dense_weight_stream_gib"],"series":[{"label":"Projected active","color":"#8a6500","tone":"warning"},{"label":"Same-size dense","color":"#53636a","tone":"neutral"}],"rows":[{"label":"Projection A","values":[150.561,1500.561]},{"label":"Projection B","values":[420.561,5820.561]}]}],"method":["Values are calculated from the public resource-audit projection envelope.","The scenarios do not measure model quality, training memory, serving latency, or token throughput."],"boundaries":["Projection math only; measured scale-ladder evidence and resource-audit projections must remain separate.","Anonymous projection envelopes only; raw architecture inputs, scenario names, source paths, command names, script names, and mechanism knobs are not published.","Parameter counts are normalized to M.","Active-weight stream estimates are single-user decode projection signals, not throughput, training-memory, model-quality, production-readiness, or external reproduction claims.","Global training, scoped residency, and optimizer-state estimates remain separate claims."]},{"id":"diligence-readiness","title":"Diligence readiness","route":"/erais/proof/diligence-readiness/","source_artifact":"/erais/proof/diligence_readiness/diligence_readiness_summary.json","category":"Projections and diligence","evidence_class":"control","posture":"reviewed","currency":"stale","currency_reason":"The pack predates current phase failures, evidence families, registry repairs, and the present release hold.","next_evidence":"Rebuild diligence coverage from the next clean approved evidence release and retain every unresolved gate.","decision_relevance":["diligence","investment","governance"],"release_reviewed_on":"2026-07-28","search_publication":{"state":"noindex","reviewedOn":"2026-07-28","evergreen":false,"review":{"distinctSearchQuestion":false,"standaloneExplanatoryValue":false,"currentOrDeliberatelyEvergreen":false,"boundaryUnderstoodStandalone":false,"notMisleadingOrSuperseded":false,"approvedPublicInterpretation":false,"uniqueMetadata":false,"contextuallyLinked":false}},"generated_at":"2026-07-06T00:28:45.127734Z","finding":"Diligence artifacts and boundary controls are explicitly inventoried rather than implied.","caveat":"Readiness for diligence is not a declaration that all product, legal, or release risks are closed.","related":["review-readiness","quality-gates"],"completeness":"complete_for_public_presentation","downloads":[{"label":"Source summary","format":"json","href":"/erais/proof/diligence_readiness/diligence_readiness_summary.json"},{"label":"Diligence artifact coverage values","format":"csv","href":"/erais/proof/diligence-readiness/artifact-coverage.csv"}],"metrics":[{"id":"investor-artifacts","label":"Investor artifacts present","display":"14/14","context":"Controlled diligence artifact inventory.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.investor_artifacts_present + headline.investor_artifacts_required"},{"id":"research-artifacts","label":"Research artifacts present","display":"14/14","context":"Controlled research artifact inventory.","tone":"positive","source_field":"headline.research_artifacts_present + headline.research_artifacts_required"},{"id":"security-files","label":"Files in security review","display":"130","context":"Zero issues reported in this approved aggregate.","source_field":"headline.security_scanned_file_count"},{"id":"distribution","label":"Access posture","display":"Controlled","context":"Protected diligence material requires an agreement or NDA.","tone":"warning","source_field":"headline.agreement_or_nda_required"}],"charts":[{"id":"artifact-coverage","kind":"progress","title":"Diligence artifact coverage","description":"Present and required artifacts for investor and research review packs.","finding":"Both controlled inventories report complete artifact presence; access and claim approval remain separate gates.","unit":"artifacts","precision":0,"projection":false,"download":"/erais/proof/diligence-readiness/artifact-coverage.csv","source_fields":["headline.investor_artifacts_present + headline.investor_artifacts_required","headline.research_artifacts_present + headline.research_artifacts_required"],"series":[{"label":"Present","color":"#00845f","tone":"positive"},{"label":"Required","color":"#53636a","tone":"neutral"}],"rows":[{"label":"Investor","values":[14,14]},{"label":"Research","values":[14,14]}]}],"method":["Investor and research artifact inventories, claim matrices, risks, clean-room reproduction, security review, and controlled release are checked separately.","Complete inventory coverage does not remove agreement, human approval, or claim-status requirements."],"boundaries":["Controlled-diligence metadata only; this is not the private investor data room or research-partner pack.","Investor data-room and research-partner materials require agreement/NDA scope and explicit human approval before disclosure.","A controlled investor evidence-set approval exists, but it excludes raw assets, checkpoints, private datasets, local run state, foundation assets and broader public release.","No artifact paths, source paths, invocation transcripts, invocation names, raw claim text, row IDs, hashes, raw data, prompts, weights, checkpoints, private traces, or mechanisms are bundled.","This public page does not grant permission to distribute controlled materials.","No dense-baseline superiority, production-readiness, source-release, unrestricted reproducibility, or proven-breakthrough claim."]}],"canonical":"https://neuroforge.io/erais/proof/catalog.json","provenance":{"snapshot_date":"2026-07-28","site_commit":"490bd51ff8adc1c27b35c1899aef34940bd42572","build_receipt":"https://neuroforge.io/.well-known/build.json","content_digest_sha256":"5b8d0195d839f5a10193382f0882eb99a60d166a46bcec80b15e5fd5534b2f21","authorities":{"narrative":{"repository":"neuroforge-io/neuroforge_business","commit":"3a3878075e43a3090ac85d1d524c066db230bc3a","artifacts":["README.md","business/NEUROFORGE_ALIGNMENT_20260922.md","CURRENT_NARRATIVE.md","project/CURRENT_EXECUTION_PROGRAMME.md","business/README.md"]},"commercial":{"repository":"neuroforge-io/neuroforge_business","commit":"8edc97a685b4eb464cd6bc1c2f0e81bf50858600","artifacts":["business/NEUROFORGE_MESSAGE_AND_DISCLOSURE_AUTHORITY_V2_20260821.md","products/lead/NF-A0_BOUNDARY_WORKSHOP.md","products/lead/NF-A1_PRIVATE_TECHNICAL_KNOWLEDGE_CELL.md","business/NEUROFORGE_INVESTOR_MASTER_DECK_RELEASE_20260821.md"]},"reviewed_results":{"repository":"neuroforge-io/erais","review_commit":"ab5cf5bd390ecd232413c0d587fd9bd9f47ac680"},"reviewed_engineering":{"repository":"neuroforge-io/erais","review_commit":"6f20efa8bf6f6f2a86312d0fb80eef1460bb19a1","public_record":"/current-engineering.json"},"observed_repository_head":{"commit":"5fcbe5da65bd22d0d4684994b4d7d497eccae21f","observed_at":"2026-08-30T19:41:56+10:00","worktree":"origin_aligned_observed_head","research_state":"repository_motion_unreviewed","authoritative_for_public_results":false,"guidance":"Repository motion is not a result. Use reviewed_results for public evidence claims."}},"supersession_guidance":"If a cached resource conflicts with another description, prefer the live https://neuroforge.io/.well-known/build.json receipt and https://neuroforge.io/positioning.json authority, then retain the evidence boundary attached to the relevant record."}}